Printable View
Just for reference, the photo of the beautiful black 1970 Kremer OLDEN KOTT S/T used a number of times in this thread and this:https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...70-kremer-info came out of the 1984 Chris Harvey PORSCHE book ..... One of my very favorite period S/T pics ever !!!... ;)
(No when or where in the caption... :o)
The trackside advertising suggests Italy? The uniform too? Cartoon on wall is Tony the Tiger Exxon seen here logo at Monza 1000km in 1969
Attachment 607688
Think it might be this 911 which did not qualify in 1970?
Attachment 607693
Harvey book image taken the following year in same 1000km di Monza race late april 1970?
Attachment 607694
Not my era of interest so maybe experts or our Italian contributors might comment ?
Steve
Steve,
I believe Hugh sussed it out in the Kremer 911T thread that it is in fact Monza in 1970...
https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...mer-info/page5
Cheers
Always likely the knowledgable Hugh would know something like that. Was in the mode to figure it out from first principles as been to my clubs festive Christmas motoring quiz where my plucky team of six amateurs were pipped to the overall win by just a few points by a team of pros from Bonhams :)
Attachment 608245Attachment 608246
ceiling mounts on the "ST" camera?
+
¿Were there more than one camera car? I'm not sure if this is an accurate question, but I can't see the detail of one of the 911s having a radio antenna in the images.
Attachment 608248
I have the book on the Toad Hall car and yes there was a second car used. It was just a regular 911.
Thank you, I always had the doubt, I think this photo is already posted, but it can be on the 23T with the same license plate, but I don't recognize in the image where both are together the detail of the antenna because it's not visible, or it's the other car...Quote:
Originally Posted by niall1
Attachment 608309
If these cars are made by the official dealership, why is the rear badge missing, the 2.4? I've seen this effect on the white S/T (which has factory photos, the typical).
Attachment 608310Attachment 608311
What causes the difference in these flares if it's understood they used the same part? Did this camera car have any impact?
Attachment 608312Attachment 608311
The camera car doesn't have holes in the bumper, does this tell us anything? Does it say it's fiberglass instead of metal? Or metal with the holes covered?
It also doesn't have holes for, nor catadioptric devices.
+
https://www.early911sregistry.org/forums/showthread.php?171401-Trying-to-understand-competition-long-hood-911s-and-the-Sports-Purpose-program
If I remember correctly details about the two cars were discussed into this excellent thread:
https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...ST-in-Progress
May @letsrollbabe be thanked for his work :cool:
Hi everyone, first of all : Happy new year !!
I'm doing research on 911 STs from 1972. Of the 21, I don't have information on 2 of them. Number #0983 and #1328.
If anyone has a name, photo, anything (appart engine number) to start, researching I would be very grateful.
Thanks a lot for your answers !!
Gabriel
Gabriel
I sent you a PM