Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: Window Sticker Reference

  1. #11
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304

    '74 US Carrera . . .

    . . . see post #42 . . .
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...o-Sample/page5
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  2. #12
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304

    '69 Targa . . .

    . . . see post #78 . . .
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...o-Sample/page8
    Attached Images Attached Images  

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  3. #13
    Pay to play Schiefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,275
    Quote Originally Posted by mike curnow View Post
    Very convenient for those people who want to make up fake window stickers.
    Hi Mike,
    What is your concern?? That people will fake these documents to make their cars more "original"????

    71E:



    More on the car here: http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...for-US-history
    S-Reg #1382
    67S Lavender
    70S Silver, original Slate Gray Japan delivery

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Phila Pa. area
    Posts
    1,235
    You think having the window sticker doesn't make a car more valuable in and of itself? Maybe not in Norway but in the USA it does.
    We know the COA tend to be incorrect, so now a person can modify their car, add a sunroof maybe, put it on the window sticker and now its legit. You don't think this won't happen? Computer pictures of the window stickers have never been real easy to obtain. Usually they were poor pictures, never the year you wanted, or had the options you might be interested in. But by putting a lot of stickers on one thread it makes it much easier to do whatever you want.
    Mike

  5. #15
    I would not ever trust a copy of anything as a way to verify or assert what it contains. only the original first an only window sticker that came with the car
    has any credibility with me. an original will be difficult to pass the sniff test, literally.
    Richard aka le Zookeeper
    early reg #1128

  6. #16
    Pay to play Schiefer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,275
    Point taken and I´m no more interested than you in seeing any documentation being tampered with. The dilemma for all the good guys here is that the more we see, the more we learn.. What about kardexes? Should those be removed as well??

    I will bow for the collective wisdom of this board. Let me know if I should remove my post, watermark it or something else.
    S-Reg #1382
    67S Lavender
    70S Silver, original Slate Gray Japan delivery

  7. #17
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304
    Quote Originally Posted by Schiefer View Post
    . . . The dilemma for all the good guys here is that the more we see, the more we learn . . .
    Hear-hear . . . . . . .

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  8. #18
    Senior Member Harvey Weidman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oroville, CA
    Posts
    1,850
    The 71 E from Bob Smith looks so messed up it is probably the original.
    We were told we would be fined if we touched the Monroney sticker.
    The customer had to remove it, we couldn't even touch it after the sale.....
    Every dealer had an additional window sticker for changes or additions.
    They clearly added A/C and removed leather seats.
    What is it with the transportation? First the trucking is added then subtracted for East?
    The car was imported through the SoCal (P/A Pacific) so why not charge more for delivery to the East?
    And "Make Ready" was not to be charged to the customer, unless it was some sort of prep for shipping?
    Anyway that wouldn't fly at our dealership, maybe because we were close to the Fed office in charge of that stuff and were reminded frequently about the laws...
    Looks about right for Bob Smith though
    H
    Last edited by Harvey Weidman; 05-31-2014 at 05:23 PM.

  9. #19
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,304

    '73 Targa . . .


    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,237
    This one (above) is very unusual in that it has a serial # in red that I have not seen before.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.