Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: FS: 2.7RS Spec Engine

  1. 06-22-2014, 11:24 AM #1
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145

    FS: 2.7 Engine

    Sold sold sold
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by tpweiss9953; 06-24-2014 at 08:47 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 06-22-2014, 12:34 PM #2
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145
    A few more pics...

    image-57.jpg

    image-58.jpg

    image-59.jpg

    image-60.jpg
    Last edited by tpweiss9953; 06-22-2014 at 12:56 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 06-22-2014, 12:56 PM #3
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145
    Webers are going on....

    image-61.jpg

    image-62.jpg

    image-63.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 06-22-2014, 02:01 PM #4
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145
    Fan on.

    image.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 06-22-2014, 06:00 PM #5
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145
    SOLD! Thanks!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 06-23-2014, 04:50 AM #6
    andyjboy
    andyjboy is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,694
    I've never understood how someone can advertise an 'RS-spec engine' only to find that one of the key elements - the mfi system - has been replaced by a pair or Webers ...

    - &, in addition in this case :

    Quote Originally Posted by tpweiss9953 View Post

    - new JE pistons 9.8:1

    - 4 bearing cam towers with custom Dougherty cams


    I'm sure it's a very nice engine - but it's not 'RS-spec' ....


    .
    Andy

    Early 911S Reg #753
    R Gruppe #105
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 06-23-2014, 05:21 AM #7
    tpweiss9953
    tpweiss9953 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    145
    Thanks for the clarification. Apologize for any confusion.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 06-24-2014, 06:33 AM #8
    Fubawu
    Fubawu is offline
    Senior Member Fubawu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto CDN and Williamsport PA
    Posts
    1,162
    I think it is the fact it is built to 2.7 more then anything else. Other then that nothing else is RS spec.
    That being said looks like a good buy!
    911 1967S 308470
    [B]911 1965 301946 Irish Green
    [B]911 1965 302962 Polo Red
    911 1965 300760 White SOLD
    911 1971S S/T 2.5
    914-6 1970 GT 2.3
    Look for me at a track near you!
    Early S Reg #2699
    https://www.facebook.com/#!/MachineMotorsports
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.