Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Silver to Gold in 1966. When did it happen?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,090

    Silver to Gold in 1966. When did it happen?

    Does anyone know when the engine mount bolts went from silver to gold in 1966? The factory parts book I have just gives sizes for the nuts and bolts but doesn't designate the color for these. Any help would be appreciated.
    Chris

  2. #2
    This is one of the most hotly debated questions and the answer is still elusive. My own view is that is has to do with Hexavalent Chromium conversion coatings (which give it the characteristic yellow color) not having DIN approval until 1967. If you look at original 66 cars, you see mostly silver with a mix of yellow, but if you look at 67 cars, you see much more yellow. So I think that MY 66 should be silver and MY67 (from the Factory re-opening in August) should be yellow.

    I had this discussion many times with Grady Clay (RIP) about as reliable an authority as there ever was, and his view was as above.

    Others have different views.
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  3. #3
    I have an old maroon binder original '67 parts book and the fastener spec on all the silver/yellow fasteners is "verz." which is zinc. That said, it was not Porsche's specification but that of the fastener industry moving to a better sacrificial coating on industrial fasteners.....as stated above, it would also be dependent upon the DIN approval for such coatings. Porsche simply ordered "zinc" fasteners from Kamax or NSF or Verbus and got what they were supplying that week....left over silver or the new yellow. The same applied on the assembly line .....Heinz simply pulled what was in his bin out for his task...left over silver or new yellow. The result is cars coming off the line around that time (late '66-early '67) with silver AND yellow. No dogma...just supply line.
    Mark Smedley
    '59 VW Typ I
    '69 911T 2.7
    '86 930
    '04 GT3
    '16 Boxster GTS
    '08 MBZ AMG CLK 63 Black Series

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by smedley View Post
    I have an old maroon binder original '67 parts book and the fastener spec on all the silver/yellow fasteners is "verz." which is zinc. That said, it was not Porsche's specification but that of the fastener industry moving to a better sacrificial coating on industrial fasteners.....as stated above, it would also be dependent upon the DIN approval for such coatings. Porsche simply ordered "zinc" fasteners from Kamax or NSF or Verbus and got what they were supplying that week....left over silver or the new yellow. The same applied on the assembly line .....Heinz simply pulled what was in his bin out for his task...left over silver or new yellow. The result is cars coming off the line around that time (late '66-early '67) with silver AND yellow. No dogma...just supply line.
    That extremely well-reasoned explanation cannot be true because we all know that the Germans - especially zee Germans at zee Porsche Faktory - plan every single, solitary detail and never leave anything to chance. Nothing was done unintentionally, therefore the mixture of silver and yellow hardware was not a result of supply and assembly line chance but, rather, a calculated decision made by the Porsche brass to ensure LeMans victory and increased sales of production vehicles.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  5. #5
    You're all wrong,,,,,they were still using leftover hardware from the ME-109 production. We all agree those thrifty Germans never tossed anything
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,090
    I very much appreciate the scientific and incredibly accurate analysis. This truly is way above rocket science. This site seems to attract the worlds top minds. If we weren't so busy restoring Porsche's we could solve all the worlds problems. All this thinking and researching makes me want a beer.
    Thanks, Chris

  7. #7
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Guys on the assembly line were more likely to be named Abdul or Francisco than Heinz.
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    You're all wrong,,,,,they were still using leftover hardware from the ME-109 production. We all agree those thrifty Germans never tossed anything
    Is THAT why I have all those 14mm ATF M8 nuts holding my engine case together!
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    Gold is prettier.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.