Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: hose egine-to-oil tank routing, is this correct? 1970, driver's side hose

  1. 08-30-2014, 08:25 PM #1
    eaton
    eaton is offline
    Senior Member eaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    DC/Montana
    Posts
    509

    hose egine-to-oil tank routing, is this correct? 1970, driver's side hose

    Can someone take a quick look at your car and let me know if this is correct? It's the hose that goes from the driver's side of the engine to the oil tank. Does it go between the starter and the transaxle (as I have it), over the starter, or simply under the engine?

    Thanks.

    Joe

    Name: hose routing.jpg Views: 280 Size: 157.0 KB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-31-2014, 05:02 AM #2
    gsjohnson
    gsjohnson is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Woodland Hills, CA
    Posts
    2,381
    My 68 routes over the starter.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-31-2014, 07:36 AM #3
    gled49
    gled49 is offline
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    There were two small brackets that held adel clamps, one bolted to the side cover of the trans and one at the top starter bolt. The adel clamps held the oil hose over the top of the starter. Gled
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 08-31-2014, 11:03 AM #4
    eaton
    eaton is offline
    Senior Member eaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    DC/Montana
    Posts
    509
    Thanks for your help. I'll put it over the starter.

    Joe
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-10-2014, 10:08 AM #5
    Hawkeye
    Hawkeye is offline
    Inveterately Curious Hawkeye's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    93
    My '70 routes over the bellhousing & starter.

    Cheers
    JB
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-10-2014, 07:12 PM #6
    Jim Breazeale
    Jim Breazeale is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,572
    That is completely wrong. It isn't even close to a 70 transmission. What's the deal with the picture?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-11-2014, 09:47 AM #7
    eaton
    eaton is offline
    Senior Member eaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    DC/Montana
    Posts
    509
    Good point Jim. 1970 engine mated to a 1966 transmission.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.