Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: To wax or not to wax?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Vienna, St. Gallen, Stuttgart
    Posts
    386

    To wax or not to wax?

    When my car was restored the workshop recommended to have the underbody painted but not waxed because this allows the detection of any damages to the paint easily.

    All the cavities where filled with Mike Sanders, though.

    Now, my car is usually only driven in the dry, never in winter. However, during oldtimer rallyes the car may well have three days of rain to go through.

    After this year's wet Ennstal Classic I had my current workshop make up the underbody as there were some stone chips showing surface rust. The workshop manager recommended a light cover of wax for the underbody because it would prevent stone chips and rusting.

    So, gentlemen, what is your advice: to wax or not to wax?
    Keep up the speed!

    Anatol

    '68 911S coupe
    '92 964 RS NGT
    '09 987S Boxster

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    592
    I think it's a good idea. I don't see any harm to it. I'm not sure how wax would disguise anything; it's not opaque.

    Someone in another thread many moons ago mentioned they used a spray-on furniture wax in their wheel wells. Supposedly it does a better job of protecting the surface and shedding water and dirt. That might be another option.
    Jeff Jensen

  3. #3
    If you are not trapping any moisture under the wax no issues - just make sure you have a good clean moisture free surface prior to applying
    Early 911S Registry #750
    1970 911E - The Good Stuff
    2001 Toyota Landcruiser

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Vienna, St. Gallen, Stuttgart
    Posts
    386
    Thank you for your feedback! I will look into it!
    Keep up the speed!

    Anatol

    '68 911S coupe
    '92 964 RS NGT
    '09 987S Boxster

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by mobius911 View Post
    I think it's a good idea. I don't see any harm to it. I'm not sure how wax would disguise anything; it's not opaque.

    Someone in another thread many moons ago mentioned they used a spray-on furniture wax in their wheel wells. Supposedly it does a better job of protecting the surface and shedding water and dirt. That might be another option.
    From what I've read in wood working magazines, silicone is used in many US spray furniture polishes. The problem with using these products on wood is that it is difficult to repair the finish if needed due to the silicone getting in the wood, but most likely not a problem with steel. I have read a few off road threads that say waxoyl is a great protection, displaces water and then protects from future moisture.
    E Sully
    1973.5 911T

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.