Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: MFI heat exchanger options: stainless vs steel Dansk vs. Factory

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    592

    MFI heat exchanger options: stainless vs steel Dansk vs. Factory

    I'm looking for a set of heat exchangers for a 73 RS that includes the clam shell for the extra pre-heat outlet on the driver's side. What I found is this:

    -Dansk stainless steel
    -Dansk regular painted steel, essentially same price for set as stainless steel
    -Factory (dealer) heat exchangers, which might be Dansk anyway, with Porsche markup of about 2X

    My question is whether the factory is selling anything different than Dansk, or whether it's just like the dashes- multiple sources but only one manufacturer.

    And is there any difference in the function/appearance/performance of any of these options? If the stainless looks the same (once painted or ceramic coated), performs the same, and the price is essentially the same, why would one not go with stainless? Originality maybe? That's pretty much out the door already unless the factory is making the originals again.
    Jeff Jensen

  2. #2
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Why not get the Dansk SSI's.
    If you want original look you can ceramic cot them too. Although they are a thing of beauty bare.
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  3. #3
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    If it matters, remember there was a change in the warm air path from under the car to inside the engine compartment in Jan 23rd of 73. All the new driver side heat exchangers are for cars after Jan 23rd change, which included a modification to engine side sheet metal, and an additional Alu hose. Earlier cars would require a modification to the pre-heat exchanger for correctness. Gled

  4. #4
    Senior Member kentf14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    1,914
    Interesting to know that the pre-heat path changed. Can you post a photo example of each style?

    Kent
    E911SR & RGRUPPE
    '65 911 "The Ol' Gal" (long gone)
    '73 S Coupe #306

  5. #5
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    I don't have examples of both, but originally the hump between #2 & #3 exhaust ports had an intake screen with a small cover over it. The revised version closed off that intake and added the tube that with an Alu flex tube went to a corresponding tube installed in the engine side sheet metal to bring clean engine compartment air into the warm air path instead of the dirty air under the car. Gled
    Attached Images Attached Images  

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.