Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: WTB: 1965 911 sun visors

  1. #1

    WTB: 1965 911 sun visors

    I need a pair of visors that are in good to great shape.
    Thanks.
    Jim

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,572
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...5-sunvisor-set

    Buy this set and then send them to Jack Arct for restoration.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,572
    I haven't talked to Jack for a couple of years but he was doing 66 and earlier sun visors with the waffle pattern. I don't think he had any interest in doing 67 or later visors with the different material. He did 66 visors because they were made of the same material as 356 visors. He is well into his 80s and may even have slowed down a bit.

    Regards

    Jim

  4. #4

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.