Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Is my engine a 2.7?

  1. #1

    Is my engine a 2.7?

    Hoping someone might be able to help me confirm (or otherwise) that my engine is a 2.7.

    Came with a project car, I don't have it running yet. It is a 2.4T case but I am told has been built up as a 2.7 (running webers). Is in a 74S that was imported from the U.S. a few years back (ex Porsche Club San Fran according to sticker on back window).

    Cylinders aren't ferrous. Is there a number or something I can check without pulling the whole thing apart?
    Cheers

    Mitchell
    HK RHD 1971T Mongrel

  2. #2
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,460
    Mitchell,

    I'd let the experts weigh in, but if I'm not mistaken, '74 type 2.7 Alusil cylinders (and the 2.7 RS Nikasil cylinders) had/has 11 cooling fins as apposed to the 15 fins a 2.4 has...

    That would be the first thing I'd look for....

    Chuck
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Mbremith View Post
    Hoping someone might be able to help me confirm (or otherwise) that my engine is a 2.7... It is a 2.4T case... Cylinders aren't ferrous.
    If the alloy cylinder fins have a split down the center, on top & bottom, then the cylinders are Biral and not 90mm.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  4. #4
    Pic from below - so 90mm (2.7 assuming rest is stock?)

    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 305
Size:  106.3 KB
    Cheers

    Mitchell
    HK RHD 1971T Mongrel

  5. #5
    My '74 has Nikasil cylinders. When the engine was rebuilt they showed no wear. Alusils showed up a bit later. Cost cutting. They're not known for good wear qualities.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Ca.
    Posts
    1,170
    Back to the original question , those look like 90 mm 2.7 cylinders .

  7. #7
    Thanks everyone, I thought it was a 2.7 but this has helped confirm.
    Cheers

    Mitchell
    HK RHD 1971T Mongrel

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Mbremith View Post
    Pic from below - so 90mm (2.7 assuming rest is stock?)
    The cylinders do appear to be Nikasil, but Mahle re-made the smaller sizes in Nikasil as well, so they could be newer 84mm cylinders.
    If they were Biral cylinders with split alloy fins, then they would definitely not be 90mm.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  9. #9
    The cylinder heads have plugs in the exhaust ports, so are '75 or later heads.

    Jon B.

  10. #10
    is that a reversal of an "anti smog" measure?
    Cheers

    Mitchell
    HK RHD 1971T Mongrel

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.