Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 456
Results 51 to 55 of 55

Thread: Sigla logo differences 65-73

  1. #51
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Boston area
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by VA_alfa View Post
    Here's another version of the Sigla windshield on my October 1965 911. I cannot claim or verify it is the original windshield.
    My '74 base, built 10/73, has exactly the same windshield markings, with the exception of the last line, where the notations are in reverse order to yours - "DOT 25 M 90". It appears that all of my glass is original to the car.

    Name:  IMG_1332.jpg
Views: 415
Size:  136.7 KB
    Last edited by Intassage; 05-05-2021 at 06:14 AM. Reason: uploaded Sigla glass ID numbers

  2. #52
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    La Verne, California
    Posts
    663
    Quote Originally Posted by Intassage View Post
    My '74 base, built 10/73, has exactly the same windshield markings, with the exception of the last line, where the notations are in reverse order to yours - "DOT 25 M 90". It appears that all of my glass is original to the car.

    Name:  IMG_1332.jpg
Views: 415
Size:  136.7 KB
    An October 65 car could not have a SIGLA DOT windshield. Too early.

  3. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Garden State
    Posts
    312
    Is the consensus that Stoddard would be the best source for an East Coast 1969 911S 'tinted' (from COA) replacement windshield?

    Mine isn't original and it is so sandblasted from driving I can't see much at night-

    Is it true one must VISIT the supplier and pick out a good one?

    I remember when I got a new windshield for my Bavaria the first replacement had a lump in it and wouldn't install-

    I also was told the Bav's glass was made in USA, shipped to BMW in Germany then shipped back to the east coast dealer where I bought it...

    PS- If the windshields are "float glass" how do they get the contour shape????
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #54
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Posts
    4
    Does anyone happen to know what the logo would look like for a factory heated windshield in a 1962 356? I have searched and searched and have come up completely empty.
    I have the glass, but it's a reproduction with the wrong logo, so I just need to find the correct logo to etch in.

  5. #55
    Senior Member dirk07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    3,344
    Do we know since when DOT markings had been on ROW windshields?

    Quote Originally Posted by hesaputz View Post
    I think that the DOT glass (and other) standards went into effect January 1, 1968. I'd be fairly confident that windshields before this period don't have the DOT marking. I know that Porsche went to one glass for all cars (ROW and US) at some point later, but I don't remember when.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.