Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: FS: @eBay - 1973 Porsche 911S motor #6331664

  1. #1

    FS: @eBay - 1973 Porsche 911S motor #6331664

    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    830
    For 25k it would need to have it's MFI.

  3. #3
    Do proper due diligence on seller
    Phil
    Early S Junkie # 658

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Member fast_e_man's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    70
    I don't normally jump into debates, preferring to read and formulate my own opinions based on objective data. In this case I will offer a data point to give experience-based input.

    Last summer I bought a 72S targa + a 72S motor built to 2.7 RS spec from Geoff. I read the on-line information about Geoff, and I called him to discuss the car. I found his answers to be honest. Where he couldn't answer my questions he volunteered to check the car and the motor, and quickly sent me pics. He sent me many pics showing details, including putting a boroscope in the sparkplug holes to confirm the pistons that were in the motor. The motor number matched a 72S motor that Ed Mayo posted in the lost & found thread. I called Ed Mayo's shop and received confirmation of that motor, as well as their professional opinion of the motor condition and its value. I didn't tell Geoff I knew where the motor came from, and everything he told me about the motor checked out 100% accurate, including receipts of the motor build tracing back to machine shop work at Ollie's.

    He was helpful with meeting my shipper, although the shipper expressed some frustration with Geoff. The shipper was not easy to deal with on my end receiving the vehicle, so I tend to think the common denominator there was the shipper being a bit flakey.

    The car, received was as described, as was the motor. A very respected vintage car restorer (on this board) in Denver has looked at the car for me, and he likes its condition. The restoration with him should start later this year.

    So, my data point is pretty positive, and I feel that I got good value in the car & motor. Experiences of others seems to vary, but in my case I found him to be a good guy to deal with, and I'd do another transaction with him if our paths cross again.
    ____________________________
    1971S targa (project)
    1972S targa
    1973E targa
    1996 cab

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    "Notorious con man" comment way too harsh.
    Always 3 sides to every story.

    Geoff is a good guy and like all sellers who move a lot of product he has his fans and his enemies.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Beck View Post
    "Notorious con man" comment way too harsh.
    Always 3 sides to every story.

    Geoff is a good guy and like all sellers who move a lot of product he has his fans and his enemies.
    The sh$t this guy pulled over the years -- the multiple fake ID's, the dozens upon dozens of people scammed, police involvement, etc -- I'm talking about artful, creative, criminal behavior. Not unsatisfied customers, but people swindled out of thousands of dollars. Do a search on Pelican, it's all there.
    Last edited by 72targa; 08-06-2015 at 11:43 AM. Reason: Language

  8. #8
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,371
    . . . 41 watching . . .

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Geoff is part of this community.
    At this point I would hope he might weigh in to defend his reputation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.