Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Intro and MFI question

  1. #1

    Intro and MFI question

    Hello All
    I've been here for years but only an occasional visitor.
    I have a 1970 914 6 since 1983 and a '69 S that needs a restoration, no, neither is for sale.
    I do all maintenance and modifications myself except for machine work and paint.
    Here's the question.
    Can 2.2l MFI and a 3.0l be modified to make the combination work ?
    I own the complete 2.2 MFI system and the '81 SC 3.0 engine.
    I know the basics. 1.Compatible distributor or alternate ignition system.
    2.Drive sprocket on the 1-3 cyl cam, pulley for MFI on crank.
    3. Machine heads for injectors.
    4. Replace space cam with one suitable(?) for this engine. Rebuild pump.
    5. Suitable pistons.
    6. Suitable cams.
    7. Modify stacks for this application.
    The engine is going in a conversion 914 6.
    Yes, I'm aware of modern ITB systems but love MFI and want to evaluate this possibility first.
    I have MFI protractors and tools.
    What am I missing ?
    Is my idea crazy ?
    TIA
    Rory

  2. #2
    Senior Member drwhosc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Spartanburg SC
    Posts
    216
    I am not sure you are going to be able to get the bore of the intakes wide enough to handle the air needed for the 3.0 engine. Might be better to look for an engine or an intake that can support what you have. Porsche did a good job matching the intakes to the cases, and there was not that much room to make it better.

    You also need to modify the MFI pump to get the right amount of fuel in there. That can be quite $$.

    I know there was a 3.0L RSR motor, so it is possible to get an MFI system to work, but it is not going to be easy.
    -----

    71 911E RS Clone (Analog)
    88 928 S4 (V8 Trans Axle)
    99 996 (Daily Beater)

    Early S Registry # 1278

  3. #3
    Roy, if you have a 2.2L S system I think things get better for you. Call Henry at Supertec, he may have better options for throttle bodies that would match up with your 3.0. I'm going through a similar issue with a 3.0, but staying with Webers,
    but your approach would my my first choice barring financial barriers.
    Good luck,

  4. #4
    Hi Rory,

    Here is a good resource on your proposition.

    I'm looking at a similar deal with a '76 3.0 Carrera engine and '69S 005 MFI system - close to yours but not quite.

    http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...on-thread.html

    Cheers,
    Mark
    Early S #2826

    Garage:
    '73 E (2.7RS replica) - sold
    '94 968 Clubsport M030 - sold
    '67 250SE Cabriolet - sold
    '71 Skyline GT - sold
    '69 911S - sold
    '73 911T/RS

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by rory gallagher View Post
    Hello All
    I've been here for years but only an occasional visitor.
    I have a 1970 914 6 since 1983 and a '69 S that needs a restoration, no, neither is for sale.
    I do all maintenance and modifications myself except for machine work and paint.
    Here's the question.
    Can 2.2l MFI and a 3.0l be modified to make the combination work ?
    I own the complete 2.2 MFI system and the '81 SC 3.0 engine.
    I know the basics. 1.Compatible distributor or alternate ignition system.
    2.Drive sprocket on the 1-3 cyl cam, pulley for MFI on crank.
    3. Machine heads for injectors.
    4. Replace space cam with one suitable(?) for this engine. Rebuild pump.
    5. Suitable pistons.
    6. Suitable cams.
    7. Modify stacks for this application.
    The engine is going in a conversion 914 6.
    Yes, I'm aware of modern ITB systems but love MFI and want to evaluate this possibility first.
    I have MFI protractors and tools.
    What am I missing ?
    Is my idea crazy ?
    TIA
    Rory
    Been there. Done that. it was fun.

    What's your question? It sounds like you have all the answers...
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

  6. #6
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Back in the day, I had the opportunity to drive a 3.0 RS. Its an experience that is still burned into my memory, fabulous engine!
    Even at 7200ft altitude it had really great performance. Very tractable on the street, just like the 2.7 RS.
    The 917 brakes were awesome too.
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Ca.
    Posts
    1,170
    It would be easier (cheaper ) if you started with a 2.4 liter pump . Much easier to switch to an RS space cam . Yes , a 3.0 RS is definitely a memorable drive , I had the pleasure 2 years ago .

  8. #8
    Thank you all for your responses.
    What I gather is that a 2.4 setup would be a better starting point.
    I'll pose the the equation (with the 2.2 equip.) to the MFI specialists.
    The bottom line is whether the pump and the stacks can be modified to suit the engine.
    I hope it's possible.
    Last edited by rory gallagher; 02-16-2016 at 05:15 PM.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by rory gallagher View Post
    Thank you all for your responses.
    What I gather is that a 2.4 setup would be a better starting point.
    I'll pose the the equation (with the 2.3 equip.) to the MFI specialists.
    The bottom line is whether the pump and the stacks can be modified to suit the engine.
    I hope it's possible.
    The answer is yes. You can modify the 2.0L and 2.2L MFI parts to work on your motor.
    -Marco
    SReg. #778 OGrp: #8 RGrp: #---
    TLG Auto: Website
    Searching for engine #907495 and gearbox 902/1 #229687

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.