Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Everybody Sues The EPA

  1. 02-18-2016, 05:30 AM #1
    sithot
    sithot is offline
    Senior Member sithot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,746

    Everybody Sues The EPA

    I'd like to see ethanol go the way of the dinosaur.

    http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2...ts/?refer=news
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-18-2016, 10:26 AM #2
    RSTarga
    RSTarga is offline
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Everybody loves their subsidies, and they vote!
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-18-2016, 11:02 AM #3
    37yrold911
    37yrold911 is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Congress is the real culprit and it isn't going to change. Corn state Republicans want their subsidy (as per above) and Democrats want cleaner air. EPA is just a poster child.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-18-2016, 01:30 PM #4
    sithot
    sithot is offline
    Senior Member sithot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,746
    Here's an old article from Forbes:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamescon.../#1a188e632ca2
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 02-19-2016, 03:46 AM #5
    sithot
    sithot is offline
    Senior Member sithot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    7,746

    Members of Congress call for investigation of Shell over climate change

    Your tax dollars at work.
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...218-story.html



    Slippery slope.
    Early S Registry #235
    rgruppe #111
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-20-2016, 10:09 AM #6
    dummkopf
    dummkopf is offline
    Thread Killer dummkopf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mound, Louisiana
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by sithot View Post
    Your tax dollars at work.
    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...218-story.html
    What a joke!!! I wonder how much this BS suit will cost Shell? SMH...

    BTW I don't like ethanol anymore than anyone.
    72 911S Targa #0807 95+% German.

    Paul Harrop 12.5% German.

    Early S #2059
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-20-2016, 11:03 AM #7
    37yrold911
    37yrold911 is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Why is it a joke? I guess you have not invested in Shell.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 02-20-2016, 11:55 AM #8
    dummkopf
    dummkopf is offline
    Thread Killer dummkopf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mound, Louisiana
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by 37yrold911 View Post
    Why is it a joke? I guess you have not invested in Shell.
    What? Did you bother reading the article?

    Do I really have to explain why it is a joke?

    Why is it wrong that Shell pays money to prove GW is false, and it is not for liberal money (not to mention government money) given to prove GW is real???

    Democrats trying to harm the oil companies again using made up BS. That is why it is a joke. Double standard.
    72 911S Targa #0807 95+% German.

    Paul Harrop 12.5% German.

    Early S #2059
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 02-20-2016, 03:46 PM #9
    37yrold911
    37yrold911 is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,405
    Securities fraud is serious business. Did you not know that?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 02-23-2016, 07:22 AM #10
    dummkopf
    dummkopf is offline
    Thread Killer dummkopf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Mound, Louisiana
    Posts
    659
    Sounds like it is a fabricated story by the left to further implement more control over oil companies. Ever heard of "death from a thousand cuts"?

    There have, in the past, been strong arguments for anthropogenic climate change. Data showed industrialization-correlated warming, and computer models said that the warming would continue. But a lot of those data turned out to be wrong, or falsified, and — according to a study performed by former NASA scientist Dr. Roy Spencer — 95 percent of those climate models “failed miserably,” with the global climate proving too complex for computer simulation. The pro-anthropogenesis arguments were thrown into doubt, and new data showed a pause in global temperature change. So scientists started to change their minds.
    How the Left Is Ruining Science
    72 911S Targa #0807 95+% German.

    Paul Harrop 12.5% German.

    Early S #2059
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.