Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 1967 2.0S engine value

  1. 04-18-2016, 08:36 AM #1
    Carreracv
    Carreracv is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Madrid. Spain
    Posts
    30

    1967 2.0S engine value

    Hello guys

    I´m thinking about selling an original 1967 2.0S engine, Type 901/02, engine number 961091 that is fitted in my 2.2T car, and would rather look for a correct engine for this car.

    As you know this is a special engine with an early alum case. It is complete but has Zenith carbs fitted insted of its correct Weber. It runs but it is advisable to rebuild it.

    What price do you think would be correct for this engine as it is? Which one if I sell it completely rebuilt?

    Thank you!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-18-2016, 06:44 PM #2
    Frank Beck
    Frank Beck is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Since no one else is willing to help...

    I would think it should be worth at least $12,000.
    Last edited by Chuck Miller; 04-18-2016 at 09:41 PM. Reason: No offers, no negotiations on the General Forum
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-18-2016, 08:45 PM #3
    72targa
    72targa is offline
    Senior Member 72targa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    13,216
    The engine number might be of interest (and of value) to the party with the matching chassis...
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-19-2016, 07:01 AM #4
    Carreracv
    Carreracv is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Madrid. Spain
    Posts
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by 72targa View Post
    The engine number might be of interest (and of value) to the party with the matching chassis...
    Yes. In fact I would be very happy to even find the matching chassis.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-19-2016, 07:07 AM #5
    Frank Beck
    Frank Beck is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    My post was in jest Chuck.
    Even my wife knows that a complete 67S motor is worth more than $14k.

    However I was serious about rebuilding it. That's still a bad idea.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-19-2016, 12:02 PM #6
    Carreracv
    Carreracv is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Madrid. Spain
    Posts
    30
    Sorry if this post is not suitable to the rules of this forum.
    It is not my intention to negociate a possible trade here. There is no market where to check this engine value, that´s why I have asked for help. In fact I have not taken de decision to sell it yet.
    If administrators understand this is not correct, please, don´t hesitate in deleting it or moving to the correct forum.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-19-2016, 02:29 PM #7
    72targa
    72targa is offline
    Senior Member 72targa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    13,216
    Price inquiries occur here in General Info. You may have to post pictures and additional details to obtain a useful response.
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-21-2016, 10:56 AM #8
    J.T. Johnson
    J.T. Johnson is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2
    Ohh long time 911 guru may I be so bold to ask what the best way you may suggest would be to locate the current owner of car 1967 911 S ID#307793; as a few months ago I purchased the complete and together ran/will run (no compression test done yet) 67 911 S engine that came in that car when new (by the latest data I just received from my sources) I don't want to list it for sale yet in the classifieds here until I here from you and a few members ideas on same. Sure it's long shot; but it would be great to re-unite the two again. JT
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-21-2016, 11:25 AM #9
    Chuck Miller
    Chuck Miller is offline
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,459
    Post it here JT :
    http://www.early911sregistry.org/for...d-Found-Thread
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88
    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-21-2016, 12:01 PM #10
    J.T. Johnson
    J.T. Johnson is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2
    OK Thanks Chuck for a direction to go. Will do...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.