Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Should new clutch package be balanced?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    lynchburg, Va
    Posts
    637

    Should new clutch package be balanced?

    2.7 RS clone motor finally needs new clutch after 25 years. Should new clutch and existing flywheel be re-balanced or let sleeping dogs lie?
    1969 911S Targa
    1970 911S Coupe
    1973 911T w 3.2
    1972 Alfa GTV 2000

  2. #2
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,459
    When I did my motor rebuild in '03 we sent the clutch and flywheel in with the rest of the usual balance stuff...

    Not sure about just the clutch, but if you were to resurface the flywheel, then I'd send'm both in...

    My 02
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    S. F. Bay Area
    Posts
    1,278
    You might look into having it "match balanced". This process balances the new pieces to the old, under the assumption that the old parts balancing was fine.
    Brian
    S Reg #1032

    "I measured twice, cut three times, and it's still too short!"

  4. #4
    I think that the way we balance bottom end assemblies is interesting and much of what we need to do will depend to the history of the engine.

    I would expect that a 911 crank have been reasonably well balanced and Porsche specify a maximum out of balance.

    The next question is how well the flywheel we bolt on has been balanced and how it has been corrected.

    With steel flywheels that are machined well the out of balance forces could be very small and with a modern CNC could well be within acceptable limits without any further work.

    If the flywheel has been component balanced it is likely to have been centered on an accurate mandrel so it runs true.

    As long as it has minimal run out when bolted to the crank it could well be good it could be good enough and by measuring the run out it should be quite easy to decide if it needs more work.

    If the flywheel and crank have been balanced as an assembly and corrected by drilling the flywheel then it will need re-balancing when the flywheel is changed.

    Clutches are more problematic.

    Hoffmann make a range of clutch balancing machines and production clutches are quite liklely to be well balanced - particularly Sachs, LUK and the like.

    Again the issue is likely to be run out due to the mounting holes in the flywheel,

    I must say that if I had a stock flywheel wit a good face and a replacement Sachs or Kennedy clutch I don't think I would be too worried.

    If you fit an Aluminium Clutch as a replacement it will be of less concern as it is a lighter assembly.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    lynchburg, Va
    Posts
    637
    Thanks. Using stock replacement Sachs clutch and original steel flywheel. Was always very smooth to redline.
    1969 911S Targa
    1970 911S Coupe
    1973 911T w 3.2
    1972 Alfa GTV 2000

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.