Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: S Specific Intermediate Shaft?

  1. #1
    Porsche Addict Insomnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    86

    67S Specific Intermediate Shaft?

    I've been hearing that I need a specific IMS for the 2.0S motor I'm building. Is this simply a matter of the early IMS' running directly on the case ('Version I' shown in the PET) versus those on the mag cases using insert bearings?

    If so, is there a benefit (aside from a less expensive IMS) to having an early case modified to accept the later style shaft and associated bearings?

    Thanks in advance.

    Name:  2016-09-02_17-14-01.jpg
Views: 381
Size:  116.3 KB
    Last edited by Insomnic; 09-03-2016 at 12:28 PM.
    Greg Bartley
    GM at Makellos Classics | PCA-SDR Webmaster
    2018 911 GT3 (Graphite Blue/Black)
    1973 911T /w Rothsport 3.6 (Raspberry/Black) [FOR SALE]
    1971 911T ROW (Light Ivory/Black) [SOLD]
    1969 911T /w 31k miles (Polo Red/Black) [FOR SALE]
    1967 911S #307904 (Tangerine/Black) Looking for engine #961590 and gearbox #104594

  2. #2
    Where are you 'hearing' that?
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  3. #3
    You need an IMS that matches the size of your case, which is either a 0 or a 1. And of course you should measure the backlash with everything assembled, before you close the case.

    I suppose you could modify the case to take the bearing shells from the later case-- but Porsche only did this because the IMS running in the magnesium without bearings wore the case prematurely. If you look in Bruce Anderson's book you can see the various types including the wear.

    SO. . . if you can't find an early intermediate shaft then you have to modify the case. If you can, use that, but make sure it's the right size and that you measure the backlash and it's in spec. Of course you would measure the backlash anyway.

    If I were doing it I would box the whole thing up and send it to Ollies and let THEM take care of it.
    1966 911 #304065 Irischgruen

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    575
    I'm sure some experts will chime in but your engine is. An early sand cast alum case. A later mag style ims w bearings will not fit in your case that runs without bearings. You need to find the appropriate early version UNLESS you have Ollies or similar modify your case to fit the newer and more available ims.

  5. #5
    Porsche Addict Insomnic's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    86
    I appreciate all of the info and the nudge to the Anderson book (who knew pcar book shelves could be good looking AND functional ).

    I ended up finding one at a local swap meet for $45; am I correct in believing that this is a proper lay shaft for the early aluminum cases?

    Name:  image.jpg
Views: 261
Size:  85.0 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 247
Size:  68.5 KBName:  image.jpg
Views: 254
Size:  78.6 KB
    Greg Bartley
    GM at Makellos Classics | PCA-SDR Webmaster
    2018 911 GT3 (Graphite Blue/Black)
    1973 911T /w Rothsport 3.6 (Raspberry/Black) [FOR SALE]
    1971 911T ROW (Light Ivory/Black) [SOLD]
    1969 911T /w 31k miles (Polo Red/Black) [FOR SALE]
    1967 911S #307904 (Tangerine/Black) Looking for engine #961590 and gearbox #104594

  6. #6
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    Those are inside the engine, so I never leave the ALU gear or the chain wheels to chance. Available ALU gears require machining. G.Led

  7. #7
    The aluminum gear seems to be the later one and its mounting somewhat altered.
    I still have one NOS early aluminum gear.
    PM if needed.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by crummasel View Post
    The aluminum gear seems to be the later one and its mounting somewhat altered.
    That appears to be the correct gear for an early intermediate shaft- why do you think it's a later gear?

    Early gears were fastened with 3 bolts and located with 3 dowels, while later gears were fastened with 6 bolts.
    Here's a comparison between the two versions, which also had different mounting offsets. Notice that the offset is deeper on the early gear, from this side...

    Name:  DSCN0405.jpg
Views: 175
Size:  127.4 KB

    There was never an S-specific gear or shaft for any standard production engine.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.