Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: WTT: '73 "S" heads (dual plugged) for stock versions

  1. #1

    WTT: '73 "S" heads (dual plugged) for stock versions

    The original heads on my '73 were machined for dual plugs about 16K miles ago by the previous owner. I want to replace them with the same castings that have a date code between 12/72 and 3/73. The replacement "S" heads must be serviceable and have casting numbers of 911104307.1R and K1819h.

    Bit of a long shot, I know.

  2. #2
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Why don't you just plug the hole and leave yourself open to later using a dual plug ignition?
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Ditto.

    Have the heads fly cut to make up for the itsy bitsy loss of compression from the extra eyebrow. 2.4's need some compression added anyway because they're totally lame when stock.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by RSTarga View Post
    Why don't you just plug the hole and leave yourself open to later using a dual plug ignition?
    If I were building any other car, I would just find another dual plug distributor to stick back on it. But it's a first series RS and I'm really trying to make this one just like it rolled out of the factory. My initial thoughts were to buy the correct date coded replacement heads and keep these dual plugged ones for a future project, but I've had no luck in buying loose heads, so I'm now trying this trade approach.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Ahhhh...
    That changes things.

    Ship to Ollie's. Ike will make them like new.

  6. #6
    Thanks for the lead. Talked to them - they can certainly fill the extra plug hole, but couldn't repair the external cosmetics where the fins were machined away.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Beck View Post
    Ahhhh...
    That changes things.

    Ship to Ollie's. Ike will make them like new.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Quote Originally Posted by murphyrg View Post
    Thanks for the lead. Talked to them - they can certainly fill the extra plug hole, but couldn't repair the external cosmetics where the fins were machined away.
    ???

    That cannot be seen with a stock valve cover in place?

    You are much further ahead having this harmless STD and being able to claim original cylinder heads than replace them.

    If you're worried about the second spark plug machining that won't show I assume that you also don't have one speck of plastic filler on the car?

    Obviously my point is that restoring a car as it rolled out of the factory is impossible. I could show you 100 cylinder heads and every one of them will have some type of defect. (broken fin, corrosion, etc.) Finding a set of properly date matched 2.4S heads that are virgin is a unicorn. Finding someone who has a set and wants to trade is a herd of unicorns.
    Last edited by Frank Beck; 09-15-2016 at 03:55 AM.

  8. #8
    Sadly, this isn't the first item where my buddy and I have spent silly money on this car for something that no one will see. Like the crazy money spent with the metalworker so that we wouldn't need to use any plastic filler (he did use lead in a couple places). We have had an ongoing debate about the value of leaving the original heads in place. But because of the mods made to the combustion chambers and the high-dome 2.8 pistons, it will never run right without functioning dual plugs. That, of course leads to having to mount a second CD unit and coil - getting even farther away from stock.

    One direction we may go is to have a set of E heads we just found with the correct date code re-machined to RS specs by opening up the ports and adding the piston relief chamfer. The casting number (that you also can't really see) will be off, but if we ever sell the car, we can disclose that, and still have the original heads go with the car in a box.

    It's unfortunate that the value of these cars has led many like us to this sort of behavior. We're both looking forward to our next project which will undoubtedly will be a hot rod that we can do whatever we want with. Anyway, Thanks for your input.

  9. #9
    member #1515
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    4,261
    Let me get this straight, you are planning to to use a single plug head with a high compression 2.8 piston?
    This to avoid going twin plug?
    Your engine is already non standard, as it has been bored out for a 2.8, so its like being a little pregnant. IMHO
    David

    '73 S Targa #0830 2.7 MFI rebuilt to RS specs

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Funny; I assumed he was going back to the stock 90mm RS spec P's & C's.

    But it does beg the question: What changes were made to the combustion chamber? If they're the Mahle 92mm street upgrade for the RS there would be no head mods necessary for those pistons.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.