Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Calling MFI control links experts

  1. #1

    Calling MFI control links experts

    Well I'm getting my MFI throttle bodies restored and I've come up against a "hurdle" with re-plating the control links.

    Some of my links are ferrous (attracted by a magnet) and some are not.
    Any idea of what the deal is?

    My plater said he couldn't re-cad or zinc the non-ferrous control links as they dissolve in the plating solutions....that would be a bummer.
    Seems like he already had a bad experience with this in the past.

    Anyway, any thoughts on this and what it means would be helpful.

    BTW....the engine and MFI components look to be original but who knows.
    I didn't make note of where the 3 non-ferrous control links were located amongst all of them.
    -Doug
    2022 Carrera 4S Oslo Blue
    1977 Martini Edition 924
    1989 Lancia Delta Integrale 16V

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Ca.
    Posts
    1,170
    The aluminum rods go on the throttle bodies . You should have four . They can be anodized . I think Parts Klassic in Arizona sells reproduction aluminum rods , one of the few who reproduce the aluminum .

  3. #3
    The aluminum rods were alodine finished, not anodized.
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  4. #4
    It would be interesting to get to the real detail.

    The Aluminium Rods that I have seen on the 2.0 and 2.2 throttle bodies were all silver coloured which would seem to suggest that they were finished in Alodine 1000 rather than Alodine 1200.

    Did the rods on the later throttle bodies change to steel or were they always Aluminium>

    The other 4 rods are also of interest.

    Does anyone have the correct lengths.

    The parts numbers on the PET show as;

    2 x 901.110.062.00

    1 x 901.110.611.00

    1 x 901.110.063.00

    These numbers are used on the PET for both generations of Mag Stacks and the Plastic Stacks although I believe that on of the rods is a different length when used on 2.4 and 2.7 engines.

    Also does anyone know if the other 4 rods were steel.

  5. #5
    Chris, to the best of my knowledge, the four throttle link rods were aluminum and all the others were steel. But sometimes by this point some aluminum may have had steel replacements to replace galled thread originals.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  6. #6
    Info as I have it below. When I made these I added a little to the threaded length since thread engagement was a bit shy in my opinion; resulting in my rods being longer than OEM.

    Item Name & rod length (OEM parts); Ball to ball length; OEM rod length
    Butterfly rod; aluminum; 118mm; 88mm
    Throttle link rod (two per engine); 149.5mm; 120mm
    Pump rod; 114mm; 88mm
    Bell crank rod (72-73); 304mm; 274mm
    Bell crank rod (69); 275mm (TBD); 245mm

    Ends were threaded: 17mm for LH threads & 21mm for RH threads (the extra length was for the wrenching nut affixed to the rod)
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  7. #7
    Paul,

    Thank you,

    I imagine that the two lengths shown are for the different throttle bodies and stacks?

    or is it rod length and typical overall length
    Last edited by chris_seven; 03-06-2017 at 06:59 AM.

  8. #8
    Dimensions are for center of ball to center of ball and then the overall length of the rod itself.
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  9. #9
    Thank You most helpful.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.