Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 2.2T engine part identification

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    441

    2.2T engine part identification

    I'm doing some work on my original '70 2.2T engine, mainly inspecting it and some cosmetic work as the engine itself is in good shape. Its not in the car at the moment and I'm thinking about buying a long term RHD restoration project and putting my 3.2SS into the project prior to selling my current car (or maybe I'll just keep them both). According to the PO, the original engine has S cams installed. From what I've read, the 03 on the end of the cam, confirms that it is an S cam. Please let me know if that is not correct.The car is still running the original Zenith carbs.

    Name:  IMG_1234.jpg
Views: 195
Size:  87.7 KB

    Without pulling the engine apart completely, I'm trying to work out if the PO went any further than the cams and installed a counterweighted crank too and S P&C's. Is there any easy way of identifying the crank or the P&C's externally? I don't have current contact details for the PO, so can't ask him. When I bought the car, I didn't realise that the T didn't have a counterweighted crank. Here's a couple of pics, unfortunately the part number is worn, so I can't tell. Are there any other signs that would differentiate the crank or P&C's without stripping the engine down?

    Name:  IMG_1245 2.jpg
Views: 181
Size:  64.1 KB

    I can't see inside the engine either:
    Name:  IMG_1242.jpg
Views: 177
Size:  168.6 KB

    Thanks
    Paul
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by PMNorris View Post
    From what I've read, the 03 on the end of the cam, confirms that it is an S cam. Please let me know if that is not correct.
    Paul, the 03 stamps on the rear identifies your cams as T, not S.
    I have a pair of 2.2T cams with 03 stamps and early 70 dates, billet numbers 901.105.133.OR and 901.105.134.OR.

    Your chain tensioners are probably original to that engine, and should be replaced.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  3. #3
    Stock cylinders on a '70T were cast iron and so the fins should show oxidation. S p/c's were aluminum and will look silver, not brown. Easy to tell this difference.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by Noah View Post
    Stock cylinders on a '70T were cast iron and so the fins should show oxidation. S p/c's were aluminum and will look silver, not brown. Easy to tell this difference.
    Thanks,
    Mine are oxidised, so T.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    441
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    Paul, the 03 stamps on the rear identifies your cams as T, not S.
    I have a pair of 2.2T cams with 03 stamps and early 70 dates, billet numbers 901.105.133.OR and 901.105.134.OR.

    Your chain tensioners are probably original to that engine, and should be replaced.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

    Thanks Jon, there is a lot of conflicting information on the internet (I found the point about the 03 marking on the Pelican BBS). But, thanks for clarifying. Its possible that the cams were reground. The engine has clearly been maintained as the chain ramps look hardly warn, but I'll look into replacing the tensioners.

    Paul

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.