Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: 1971 911E front hydropneumatic conversion -- what have I got here?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Posts
    145

    1971 911E front hydropneumatic conversion -- what have I got here?

    Name:  IMG_3828.JPG
Views: 707
Size:  98.2 KBName:  IMG_3833.JPG
Views: 708
Size:  76.2 KBName:  IMG_3832.JPG
Views: 679
Size:  104.2 KBName:  IMG_3826.JPG
Views: 650
Size:  95.4 KBName:  IMG_3831.JPG
Views: 704
Size:  105.7 KB


    I've decided to replace all my front rubbers (control arms, drop links, etc) with new Elephant OEM rubbers...along with turbo tie rods and new struts.

    Here is where I am lost. Obviously being an E my car came with the hydro-pneumatic struts. I've read that the original hydro struts cannot take standard strut inserts without either being replaced with non-hydro struts or some people back in the day were able to rework them to take regular inserts.

    So here is what I have currently;

    Struts are Boge #901 341 083 01

    I believe these are original hydro struts, correct? if so looks like my car was reconfigured back in the day to include sway bar and drop links and to use these struts.

    I would appreciate some input into what I have here; does it look like these struts were re-configured to take regular inserts? I was hoping to just throw some Bilstein inserts in. Should I keep these struts or source non-hydro struts? anything else look funky or wrong here?

    I don't know the size of the sway bar...didn't find any number on the end of it. Thank you.
    Last edited by ZombieBranz; 10-22-2017 at 09:20 AM. Reason: grammar
    Early 911S Registry#3437
    1971 911E

  2. #2
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,360
    I see a torsion bar ride height adjusting screw, so conversion is done. So you got that going for you.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by gled49 View Post
    I see a torsion bar ride height adjusting screw, so conversion is done. So you got that going for you.
    Yes conversion is done...happy for that...however based on part# struts seem to be original hydro struts that were customized for inserts? Or are these non hydro Boge struts that will take inserts? Thats mainly my question.
    Early 911S Registry#3437
    1971 911E

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Quote Originally Posted by ZombieBranz View Post
    ...however based on part# struts seem to be original hydro struts that were customized for inserts?
    Yes.

    Back in the day we made spacers and bushings to accommodate stock Boge inserts. Pull the inserts out and dollars to donuts that's what you'll find.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Frank Beck View Post
    Yes.

    Back in the day we made spacers and bushings to accommodate stock Boge inserts. Pull the inserts out and dollars to donuts that's what you'll find.
    Thanks Frank...will update once I get things ripped apart.
    Early 911S Registry#3437
    1971 911E

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,586
    You can usually tell the brand of insert by looking at the threaded end of the strut. Take a good picture of the strut end in the trunk and chances are that it can be positively IDd. Many of those strut conversions utilized Koni inserts. 70 and later 911s had to change the cross member and lower control arms, in order to add torsion bars. 69s only had to add torsion bars and the adjusters. A arms on 70 and later 911s with Hydropneumatic front suspension were hollow.

    RegaRDS

    jIM

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Posts
    145
    Name:  17E53E27-E40F-4C32-A530-CFD95ADD895B.jpg
Views: 609
Size:  92.9 KBName:  5484AEE7-8FF7-41D0-BD6B-CEEEC2ABCCF4.jpg
Views: 597
Size:  114.7 KBName:  9EDB748E-D6B8-4C55-B0B8-B5FB4BFDA8F9.jpg
Views: 566
Size:  83.9 KB



    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Breazeale View Post
    You can usually tell the brand of insert by looking at the threaded end of the strut. Take a good picture of the strut end in the trunk and chances are that it can be positively IDd. Many of those strut conversions utilized Koni inserts. 70 and later 911s had to change the cross member and lower control arms, in order to add torsion bars. 69s only had to add torsion bars and the adjusters. A arms on 70 and later 911s with Hydropneumatic front suspension were hollow.

    RegaRDS

    jIM
    Thanks Jim, sort of lost b/c I thought Boge struts could take a Koni or Bilstein insert but maybe that is only for the non hydro Boge? I actually already had Bilstein Boge inserts on order so your input is timely.

    here are add’l pics of strut thread....also just noticed pass. side control arm has a nice ding in it. By hollow I assume you donkt mean boxed? This are boxed but Yes these look to be hollow....in fact drv side, on the flat side of a arm, (facing driver) has a hole in it....pass side does not.

    Do you have solid control arms and non hydro Boge struts? Might just be easier to deal with non hydro struts if I am taking the time to redo it all. Appreciate the info.
    Early 911S Registry#3437
    1971 911E

  8. #8
    Senior Member Harvey Weidman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Oroville, CA
    Posts
    1,852
    When we modified the hydropneumatic cars for torsion bar suspension, we had the struts reworked at a machine shop to accept the Koni inserts (we were a distributor or we would have used Boge) and then used stock torsion bars...if there were no torsion bar splines like Jim was referring to, we put in 914 arms because they were more available and costs less.....(the spline count is different)....If you ever find any with that set up, they were probably from us.
    We did dozens of them ...mail order and in house.
    H

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Monterey, CA
    Posts
    145
    Name:  ACEFE97A-80E7-445B-B32C-6E0761151A1B.jpg
Views: 537
Size:  84.0 KBName:  1E66818B-2BB8-4D7D-BCD0-829798E1A88E.jpg
Views: 537
Size:  80.8 KBName:  505EF225-7F4B-44A0-8485-75F0CDEC2659.jpg
Views: 540
Size:  139.2 KBName:  621F4095-4BB7-4385-AC67-D98FA84FC8E2.jpg
Views: 535
Size:  127.0 KBName:  09B8D109-1571-46DD-988B-02B28E61B1FD.jpg
Views: 548
Size:  90.0 KBName:  5075BC68-19DF-4A8C-9613-825B53311656.jpg
Views: 529
Size:  51.2 KB
    Name:  7130C713-E6D2-48CB-BCFC-5C42AF14B8D3.jpg
Views: 571
Size:  104.2 KB

    Called Jim at EASY this am and he gave me enough advice for me to get the driver side control arm out. Thanks Jim...sorry our phone call disconnected...but thanks for the help!

    Got the strut off and the control arm off. Don’t have a big enough pipe wrench to get the strut cover off.

    Control arm required a little persuasion to free itself. You can see that hole...looks rough and ugly like someone did that for some reason? Any ideas?

    So far struts look servicesble so plan to follow Jim’s advice and just replace inserts.

    Will pull off other side tomorrow. Thanks for all the help/info/advice
    Early 911S Registry#3437
    1971 911E

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ZombieBranz View Post
    So here is what I have currently; Struts are Boge #901 341 083 01... I believe these are original hydro struts, correct?
    Quote Originally Posted by ZombieBranz View Post
    ...based on part# struts seem to be original hydro struts that were customized for inserts? Or are these non hydro Boge struts that will take inserts? Thats mainly my question.
    If it wasn't already clear, the number 901.341.083.01 is for a left front BOGE Hydropneumatic strut.
    The number for the right front Hydropneumatic strut is 901.341.084.01.
    You can confirm that the strut housings are Hydropneumatic by measuring the tubes, which were larger than the tubes for shock absorber struts: 64mm (2.52").
    Notice too that the strut in your photo doesn't have a metal dust cover; it didn't come with one when new.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.