Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: front aluminum cross bar question

  1. #1
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,093

    front aluminum cross bar question

    Can a 76 turbo aluminum cross bar be added to a otherwise stock 69 front suspension? It looks like a few pounds could be shed.
    Chris
    1959 Auratium Green 356A Super w/ Rudge wheels
    1970 Irish Green 914-6 w/2.2S
    Current -1967 Bahama Yellow 912 POLO 2cam4 #1
    www.reSeeWorks.com
    Personalized Vintage Porsche's and parts
    I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself-Ferdinand Porsche

  2. #2
    Bolts right up...you also have to have the separate aluminum support struts. '69 A arms will slip right in. You're saving weight, but at the wrong end of the car.
    Mark Smedley
    '59 VW Typ I
    '69 911T 2.7
    '86 930
    '04 GT3
    '16 Boxster GTS
    '08 MBZ AMG CLK 63 Black Series

  3. #3
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    You will have to update the protection tray to a late model one as the original won't fit. Gordon

  4. #4
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,714
    Quote Originally Posted by gled49 View Post
    You will have to update the protection tray to a late model one as the original won't fit. Gordon
    i assume he is saving the trays weight also...

  5. #5
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    I think you need to run the tray, just for protection! The newer trays are much heavier so parts should be weighed if you care.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,093
    Thanks guys. It'll run a tray, probably aluminum. We're saving 80 to 100 lbs on the other end as it's going to run a 2.7 2cam4 POLO, aluminum decklid, licence panel, bumperettes, and hood on the other end.
    Chris
    1959 Auratium Green 356A Super w/ Rudge wheels
    1970 Irish Green 914-6 w/2.2S
    Current -1967 Bahama Yellow 912 POLO 2cam4 #1
    www.reSeeWorks.com
    Personalized Vintage Porsche's and parts
    I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself-Ferdinand Porsche

  7. #7
    Senior Member C.Plavan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Clovis, Ca
    Posts
    386
    I have been running one on my 69 racer for years. You might as well throw on some aluminum rear trailing arms on the rear also. Extra weight savings. BTW- I don't run the tray, never have and no issue.
    Thanks,
    Chad
    911ST Race Car w/2.5L SS race motor.
    1972 911 T- Original numbers car- restoring it
    2016 Elan NP01 Prototype Chassis #20; Car Number #02
    2011 Porsche Spyder Wht/Blk/ Carbon Fiber Buckets (Sold)
    Powered by Faragallah (Aase Motors)

  8. #8
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,093
    I was under the impression the aluminum trailing arms caused the shocks to rub against the rear shock towers unless it was a 72 or 73.
    Chris
    1959 Auratium Green 356A Super w/ Rudge wheels
    1970 Irish Green 914-6 w/2.2S
    Current -1967 Bahama Yellow 912 POLO 2cam4 #1
    www.reSeeWorks.com
    Personalized Vintage Porsche's and parts
    I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself-Ferdinand Porsche

  9. #9
    Senior Member C.Plavan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Clovis, Ca
    Posts
    386
    Quote Originally Posted by cmpski View Post
    I was under the impression the aluminum trailing arms caused the shocks to rub against the rear shock towers unless it was a 72 or 73.
    Chris
    It is easy- You just machine 25mm off the mounting point. It is threaded all the way. Been running my car this way since 2005.


    Here is a good resource.
    https://members.rennlist.com/911pcar...trlArms,p1.htm
    Thanks,
    Chad
    911ST Race Car w/2.5L SS race motor.
    1972 911 T- Original numbers car- restoring it
    2016 Elan NP01 Prototype Chassis #20; Car Number #02
    2011 Porsche Spyder Wht/Blk/ Carbon Fiber Buckets (Sold)
    Powered by Faragallah (Aase Motors)

  10. #10
    Senior Member C.Plavan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Clovis, Ca
    Posts
    386
    Also keep in mind the other benefit to Aluminum trailing arms besides the weight is stiffness. They do not tweak in high load corners with sticky tires on. Here are the weights of Al vs Steel- both are bare without bearings etc..


    Thanks,
    Chad
    911ST Race Car w/2.5L SS race motor.
    1972 911 T- Original numbers car- restoring it
    2016 Elan NP01 Prototype Chassis #20; Car Number #02
    2011 Porsche Spyder Wht/Blk/ Carbon Fiber Buckets (Sold)
    Powered by Faragallah (Aase Motors)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.