Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 1965 2.0 in the UK.

  1. #1

    1965 2.0 in the UK.

    Thought you guys would like to cast an eye over this beauty.

    $90,000.





    http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1189190.htm

    Nothing to do with me by the way..... mores the pity.

    Regards, Mike.

  2. #2


    A little bit messed up here. The label belongs to the 4 way flasher switch in the middle and don't they have all chrome bezels?
    The fog lights seem to be the later ones and the wrong loudspeaker holes in the dash top indicates a retrim.
    Michael Moenstermann
    Osnabrueck - Germany
    Early 911S member #1052




    'While accelerating the tears of emotion have to flow off horizontally to the ears.'
    'Understeer is when you see the tree you are hitting, if you only hear the tree then it was oversteer'.
    'You can't treat a car like a human being - a car needs love'. (all Walter Röhrl)

  3. #3
    Senior Member vipergruen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Milan, Italy
    Posts
    801
    VIN 302785
    Engine 902777

    Original colour Ivory

    Andrea
    Andrea
    Early S registry #1082

  4. #4
    Nice looking car and plenty of money. For $90k, I would expect the seller to install the correct SWB foglights instead of the later LWB foglights....

  5. #5
    VIN 302785 is a 1966 model.

    John
    Early 911S Registry #931
    --------------------------------
    1971 911 2.2S Coupe Albert Blue
    1971 911 2.2T Coupe Tangerine
    2005 997 C2S Coupe special 1965 slate grey
    1978 911 3.0 SC Targa Silver w/chrome trim

  6. #6
    Senior Member Baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Communist Maryland
    Posts
    713
    Quote Originally Posted by Zithlord View Post
    VIN 302785 is a 1966 model.

    John
    I agree !

    Yet another scam artist trying to capitalize on the current '65 craze !

    Chuck

  7. #7
    Semjon Semjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Groningen, Netherlands
    Posts
    348
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron View Post
    I agree !

    Yet another scam artist trying to capitalize on the current '65 craze !

    Chuck
    But build in 65... It depends on the country you life in and the system of registration I think.
    My 302831 is build November 65 and a 66 model but here in The Netherlands the build date is leading for registration so mine is registered as a 65 here. Don't know about the system is the UK but it might be similar...
    Early 911S registry member #1391
    Built '65, MY66 911 in total restoration

  8. #8
    Midnight Runner popowitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West LA
    Posts
    1,004

    VIN 302785 is a 1966 model.

    In the Porsche 911 Red Book by Paternie VINs for 1965 that were built between 1/65 and 7/65 ranged from 300236 to 303390. VINs for the '66 model ranged from 303391 to 305100.

    If the book as accurate then this car is a '65 and there is no fraud.
    Registry Member #1583
    '73 911 S Aubergine (VIN#9113301295)

  9. #9
    In the UK, the DVLA (Driver Licensing Vehicle Authority) until 2001 had an annual issue of ther next registration suffix / prefix on the 1st August, following the concept of 'model year' that Porsche had.

    Examples, a car manufactured between 1st August 1972 and 31st July 1973 is 'L' (my car), e.g. L123 ABC, and is known in the UK as 'L' registration

    A car manufactured between 1st August 1973 and 31st July 1974 is 'M' e.g. M123 ABC and is known in adverts as 'M' registration.

    So, if this car was manufactured between 1st August 1965 and 31st December 1965 then it is known as a 1965 car, although it is a 1966 Model year.

    The FIA Pre 65 rules I believe meant cars manufactured up to 31st December 1964, and so those would be 1965 Model Year and very rare.


    HTH

    Ian
    Ian Highfield
    1992 964 C2 manual with RS Spec suspension and Sports interior - midnight blue - SOLD
    1973 911T (2.7 Carrera engine and loads of period mods - all steel) - SOLD
    1986 Carrera Coupe (256bhp) - SOLD

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by popowitz View Post
    In the Porsche 911 Red Book by Paternie VINs for 1965 that were built between 1/65 and 7/65 ranged from 300236 to 303390. VINs for the '66 model ranged from 303391 to 305100.

    If the book as accurate then this car is a '65 and there is no fraud.
    My 66 911 is 302982 and is a 1966 built November 24th 1965. Not sure the book is accurate.

    Cheers
    Peter

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-20-2021, 07:50 PM
  2. VIN# 1965 911 - Is this right?
    By FLH911 in forum General Info
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-02-2014, 02:49 PM
  3. FS: 1965 911 Coupe Brochure, April 1965
    By evokes in forum For Sale: 911 Parts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-27-2013, 10:24 AM
  4. 1965 911
    By 301835scott in forum For Sale/Wanted: Early 911 Cars, 1965 - 1973
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-30-2013, 08:37 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-10-2010, 12:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.