Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Correct black for jack?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    1,431

    Correct black for jack?

    I've restored these two jacks with clear cadmium, nickel and Cerakote. The close to matte black just doesn't look right, looks lifeless and dull. Anyone have good pics or a sense of what the gloss level the black should be?
    Attached Images Attached Images     
    Tru6 Restoration & Design
    69S Targa, Velvet Green
    73T Coupe, Gemini Blue
    Early S Registry #1462

  2. #2
    Senior Member Scott A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South East USA
    Posts
    909
    Name:  jack gold.jpg
Views: 196
Size:  126.3 KB

    from an unrestored 1971 T....never painted, less than 50,000 miles.
    looks much closer to a rattle can gloss black. (not a gloss black automotive paint)


    Name:  700 miles s.jpg
Views: 182
Size:  127.9 KB
    above, image from 700 mile, 1970 S.
    harder to tell the gloss or sheen on this image.

    Current long term ownership: 63 Cab, 71 911, 74 914

  3. #3
    Early 911S Registry # 237 NeunElf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    San Dimas, CA
    Posts
    1,809
    You would probably get better information about those jacks at a 914 forum. A great resource for the jacks [644.722.010.00] used on 356s since 1955 and on SWB 911s and 912s is Eric Cherneff's Porsche 356 Tool Kits website.

    There's been a lot of discussion of the correct shade of blue for the bases of those jacks but little if any about the black paint.

    I pulled the jack out of my 356A thinking it might have the original finish (it doesn't):

    Name:  356A.jpg
Views: 185
Size:  127.6 KB

    It's hard to say for sure, but I guess the original black was a little shiny. Bilstein didn't work hard on the finish.

    But, I think most of the smaller steel/cast iron pieces are most likely bare metal, not plated. Here's the jack for my 911.

    Name:  911.jpg
Views: 185
Size:  158.0 KB

    I threw those parts in my brass tumbler for many hours with extra abrasive. Looks like they're ready to go back in the tumbler.

    The brass tumbler left them darker than most jacks. Media blasting might get them new-looking.

    I had the springs and retaining rings nickel plated to try to replicate new spring steel. It's profoundly unlikely Bilstein used nickel plating but it may be close to the look of new steel.
    Last edited by NeunElf; 09-10-2018 at 06:51 PM.
    Jim Alton
    Torrance, CA
    Early 911S Registry # 237

    1965 Porsche 911 coupe
    1958 Porsche 356A cabriolet

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    1,431
    Thank you Scott, those pics help a lot. I will try Cerakote gloss black with catalyst amount proper for satin. I think that may work. And thank you Jim for the links, I'll check them out. You are correct on the plating. Originally, the post was nickel plated so that's what I did and baked to harden it. The springs were originally clear zinc plated as was the circlip. The pieces that work with the springs were originally bare metal, no plating. But I wanted a restored jack to stay restored. I would have done clear zinc but it's blue due to the brighteners used my platers these days. I always use clear cadmium in it's stead for decklid latches, etc. and thought it prudent here as well. I could have just tumbled the pieces and cleared them with Cerakote. That is another option.
    Tru6 Restoration & Design
    69S Targa, Velvet Green
    73T Coupe, Gemini Blue
    Early S Registry #1462

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.