Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Early 1969 911 help needed (distributor related)

  1. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Black Mountain, NC
    Posts
    539
    CFI = Bruce is a great guy and would be at the top of my list if you need to have repairs!!

    Regards


    Quote Originally Posted by daniel911T View Post
    The stock distributor has a dual advance mechanism - it purposely has a flat spot. The advance has two sets of weights to make the stepped curve.
    Attachment 474243

    If you have a stuck weight or broken spring or the shaft is binding, any of those things can cause the symptom you're describing,

    Your best bet is to remove the distributor, disassemble, clean, and carefully reassemble. Be sure to get new points, cap, and rotor. Re-install and test.

    There are great videos on YouTube of the disassembly process. Check this website for a wealth of early Bosch distributor info:http://www.sparkingplugs.com/9.html

    hope it helps!

  2. #12
    Senior Member Vintage Racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    15 Year Member, Sandy Springs, GA
    Posts
    615
    Many Thanks for your help,
    I'd like to keep this car with the old original ignition system. It's a street car with an exemption to emissions testing. It gets around 15 Mpg on a normal active day.

    I found the YouTube videos (thanks). This car has no notable distributor play as I see it. I don't own a vacuum testing device. My old way of testing this is to rev the engine slowly while watching the timing light to see were and when the advance kicks in.

    It's my opinion that this car already has a modified advance curve that kicks in before the factory specs.

    As I said, the car pulls hard from idle to ~ +/- 6500 Rpm which is below the recommended Rpm of 7300 Rpm.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Doc
    1972 Porsche 911
    2023 Porsche 911 Turbo
    2019 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350

  3. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Posts
    27
    Vintage Racer,
    Aside from testing with the timing light, what steps have you taken so far?

    Let me restate your problem to make sure I understand you. Your car starts and runs fine. When accelerating, the engine runs strong and normal up to 6500RPM, then loses power up to 7300. Under a timing light the timing signal (position of the timing mark) is unstable. Is that through the entire RPM range, or only some places? Is this an accurate restatement of your issue?

    It would still be helpful to have the distributor number. I'm almost positive that the one pictured is not original to a 1969 engine.

    We will figure this out!

  4. #14
    Is this the car Doc Jewell had?
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  5. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    9,752
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    Is this the car Doc Jewell had?
    Had?

    .....

  6. #16
    Senior Member Vintage Racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    15 Year Member, Sandy Springs, GA
    Posts
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by daniel911T View Post
    Aside from testing with the timing light, what steps have you taken so far?
    The distributor cap and points where replaced. I adjusted the valves and checked the plug wires (they looked new). It was running rich so I did switch around the jets with the help of some nice guys in Texas (one was Ed).

    Quote Originally Posted by daniel911T View Post
    Let me restate your problem to make sure I understand you. Your car starts and runs fine. When accelerating, the engine runs strong and normal up to 6500RPM, then loses power up to 7300. Under a timing light the timing signal (position of the timing mark) is unstable. Is that through the entire RPM range, or only some places?

    It would still be helpful to have the distributor number. I'm almost positive that the one pictured is not original to a 1969 engine.
    Not exactly. I try not to rev the engine over 6500 just to be on the safe side. I am sure that it would run well to the 7300 Rpm limit, and I don't see a rev cut-off in the distributor (I think it should be there?).

    The problem is a stumble at around 2500-3000 under part throttle. It may stumble and pop under deceleration in that area. It's annoying.

    I'll get you the distributor number. I keep the car at a local storage place.
    Doc Jewell
    retired former vintage racer (improved cash flow immediately )
    Doc
    1972 Porsche 911
    2023 Porsche 911 Turbo
    2019 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350

  7. #17
    Senior Member Vintage Racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    15 Year Member, Sandy Springs, GA
    Posts
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by daniel911T View Post
    ...It would still be helpful to have the distributor number. I'm almost positive that the one pictured is not original to a 1969 engine.
    On my best days I am a shade-tree mechanic so I know to go to the experts.

    First, I could not find the Bosch model number. There was no plate. There were Bosch part numbers. I was hoping that these pictures would help (BTW, it stumbles under load and works fine in neutral).
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    Doc
    1972 Porsche 911
    2023 Porsche 911 Turbo
    2019 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350

  8. #18
    My best guess is that you have a mismatch of advance curve, cam shaft and jetting. Try removing the vacuum line and plugging it, see if it makes any difference. I think that vacuum retard distributor was from a 68 air pump engine. What do you have for exhaust?
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  9. #19
    Senior Member NZVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,780
    Doc, Is the rotor location slot all "munted" or is it just my eyes,, ie, is there 'play' left and right when the rotor is in place ???

    Hope you get this fixed under the tree soon

    Regards
    Mark

  10. #20
    Senior Member Vintage Racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    15 Year Member, Sandy Springs, GA
    Posts
    615
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    My best guess is that you have a mismatch of advance curve, cam shaft and jetting. Try removing the vacuum line and plugging it, see if it makes any difference. I think that vacuum retard distributor was from a 68 air pump engine. What do you have for exhaust?
    Ed,
    Thanks,
    I'll try plugging it. I have a good road to test it. I think that will block timing advance at the lower RPM?

    The exhaust is headers with a megaphone so not much not resistance of exhaust gasses. It's rather loud but no problem (see the picture below).

    I agree the pictures show a lot of stuff that should be cleaned out of the distributor. No doubt.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Doc
    1972 Porsche 911
    2023 Porsche 911 Turbo
    2019 Ford Mustang Shelby GT350

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.