Page 22 of 43 FirstFirst ... 12202122232432 ... LastLast
Results 211 to 220 of 428

Thread: 300090

  1. #211
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    Still doesn't explain the purpose of the hole?
    I went up the attic where there is a NOS right side inner fender.

    Name:  F56692E5-3724-4093-8195-C6580EAABB55.jpg
Views: 627
Size:  69.2 KB
    Name:  C1FB7595-03F7-43D8-A599-0C169C48E0AC.jpg
Views: 643
Size:  68.1 KB

    No hole, no welds.

    Richard
    searching for engine (case) 903742

  2. #212
    Senior Member 300090's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    248

    Hole and welds on 1964 front shock tower

    Quote Originally Posted by preS View Post
    I went up the attic where there is a NOS right side inner fender.
    No hole, no welds.
    Richard
    Hello Richard,
    Here is an example that belongs to a friend.
    I don't know exactly what year it is.
    • Non-adjustable
    • He doesn't have the reinforcement.
    • We can see the hole and the weld.


    Name:  300090-shockTowerWelds-01.jpg
Views: 586
Size:  118.6 KB

    Name:  300090-shockTowerWelds-02.jpg
Views: 600
Size:  77.2 KB

    Name:  300090-shockTowerWelds-03.jpg
Views: 585
Size:  111.6 KB

    I'm not sure I understand the angle of view of your photos.
    On your photos of the inner fender I do not see the "washer": red arrow on my first photo.
    Your fender seems to have the reinforcement: how is this possible on an NOS part? Would the reinforcement have been welded at the factory?

    Here is the photo of the 300133 (1964) posted by Bob on this thread:
    https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...=1#post1067766

    Name:  300090-shockTowerWelds-04.jpg
Views: 578
Size:  59.1 KB

    @Bob: do you think the hole and the weld could be hidden behind the reinforcement?

    Philippe

  3. #213

    Shock Tower Weld

    Philippe,
    It appears to me that the rosette weld is about 1/3 of the leading side down from the horizontal flat . 300 133 appears to not have the weld - 331 maybe.

    As a note 300149 (a December 1964 car) did not have any dealer welded on cap supports or rosette weld. That car had 407,000 miles when it moved along to a new owner. No shimmy's or shakes in the steering and it had been WELL used. Aluminum, original, light weight steering wheel had a leather wrap for 30 years. Stiffer torsion bars, and uprated anti-roll bars. Street and track used.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Bob
    Early S Reg #370

  4. #214
    Senior Member 300090's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    248

    Shock Tower Weld

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobs 67S View Post
    Philippe,
    It appears to me that the rosette weld is about 1/3 of the leading side down from the horizontal flat . 300 133 appears to not have the weld - 331 maybe.

    As a note 300149 (a December 1964 car) did not have any dealer welded on cap supports or rosette weld. That car had 407,000 miles when it moved along to a new owner. No shimmy's or shakes in the steering and it had been WELL used. Aluminum, original, light weight steering wheel had a leather wrap for 30 years. Stiffer torsion bars, and uprated anti-roll bars. Street and track used.
    Thank you Bob and Richard,
    We plan to fill the hole and therefore not make the rosette weld.
    Philippe

  5. #215
    Senior Member 300090's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    248

    Tow hook for 1964

    Hello,
    The PET shows only one version of the tow hook: 901 501 530 20 / 90150153020
    Do you know if previous versions have existed: .00 or .10?

    Do you think 901 501 530 20 is correct for my car?

    Thank you,
    Philippe

    Name:  300090-towHook-01.jpg
Views: 473
Size:  91.7 KB

    Name:  300090-towHook-02.jpg
Views: 473
Size:  83.4 KB

  6. #216
    Senior Member Cliff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    8903one
    Posts
    2,540
    Here is a lead on tow hook for the earliest of cars: https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...front+row+hook
    To err is human; to blame it on someone else is more human...

    "You must always strive to be the best, but you must never believe that you are."
    —Juan Manuel Fangio[48]

    ”What would PORSCHE do”

    67 911 de Luxe, 356 B silver metallic / brown interior, ( buck skin really ) 67 PORSCHE [ built ] 912, Crystal blue, black interior, 72 T, Silver metallic/black interior, appearance group,factory AC.

  7. #217
    Senior Member 300090's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    248

    Tow hook for 1964

    Quote Originally Posted by Cliff View Post
    Here is a lead on tow hook for the earliest of cars: https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...front+row+hook
    Thank you Cliff.
    Philippe

  8. #218
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Location
    Sparks, Nevada
    Posts
    14
    The present number for the tow hook is 901-501-530-20-GRV and available from most sources.

  9. #219

    1964 vs later front tow hooks

    The 4 main difference areas between the 1964 and later tow hooks are:
    the side view - note the later has right angle bends while the early has a definite deep "Z" bend

    The Rod attachment indents on the later are more parallel - early has more "V".

    Front bend, later is rounder verses the early more "V" shape.

    Note the other difference is the tipped out at he sides that mate to the stamped half round shapes on the lower gas tank support cross panel.

    Hope this helps:
    Using others photos (Thanks Allen).
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    Bob
    Early S Reg #370

  10. #220
    Senior Member 300090's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    FRANCE
    Posts
    248

    Tow hook for 1964

    Quote Originally Posted by Bobs 67S View Post
    The 4 main difference areas between the 1964 and later tow hooks are:
    the side view - note the later has right angle bends while the early has a definite deep "Z" bend

    The Rod attachment indents on the later are more parallel - early has more "V".

    Front bend, later is rounder verses the early more "V" shape.

    Note the other difference is the tipped out at he sides that mate to the stamped half round shapes on the lower gas tank support cross panel.

    Hope this helps:
    Using others photos (Thanks Allen).
    Thank you Bob!
    I am sure that these details will allow the 300090 to receive a proper tow hook.
    Philippe

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.