Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: AC DK20Q jack

  1. #1
    Senior Member Veronica87911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    1,101

    AC DK20Q jack

    Has anyone bought and/or used a DK20Q jack? Comments, please, good or bad. Thanks.
    Serge

    City of Ben Franklin and Cheesesteaks
    Instagram: Truevisionmediaworks

    Early S Registry #2457
    Daisy: 1972 T with 2.7 engine and Webers
    LOOKING FOR 911 Engine # 6123044

    Rowlf: 2017 Volvo S60 with Polestar Optimization


    Mostro di Biscotti: 1975 Lancia Fulvia 1.3S Series 2

    Veronica: 1987 Carrera coupe - curves in all the right places...SOLD
    Lil' Blue: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon SOLD

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    354
    I've had the DK20 for at least 20 years and never had a problem using it with cars, trucks and few times to prop up trees. I think the only difference in the Q is they added an -ring to the nylon wheels.

  3. #3
    Senior Member TurkisTii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    138
    I have the DK20HLQ but for less than a year. I wanted the extended reach with the HL (high lift) version. These AC jacks had been on my radar for years and Pelican had a group buy last February so I joined in. The only issue I've had was not realizing the handle will fall when positioning the jack with the quick-lift pedal as I'm on the ground and able to use my hands vs. feet on the pedal. The handle fell onto the fender of another car. Fortunately the impact was not direct to cause any damage. Jack has fully met my expectations and at the $750+ price I have high expectations.

    Name:  IMG_20191007_100157.jpg
Views: 232
Size:  97.2 KB
    Early 911S Registry #3811
    '70 911S Coupe Tangerine
    Instagram @turkis.tii

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.