Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Mary Stuart Porsche

  1. #11
    Senior Member haul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    bavaria
    Posts
    2,333
    Mary Stuart, Carrera RSR,

    (Vin 911 360 0588 R6 as written in books and race records)
    as I learned today it was actually - see Hugh‘s entry #17 below -
    VIN 911 360 0686 R7

    Start Number 41
    1000km Grand Prix de Spa
    6.5.1973
    Herbert Müller/Gijs van Lennep
    5th overall, 63 Laps
    |||||
    found in the September 1973 Christophorus
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by haul; 04-22-2020 at 02:47 AM. Reason: new info
    59 750 pre unit triton
    63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
    70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
    65 912 slate gray "erwin"
    73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
    erwin_loves_polo

  2. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    441
    Here's the full thread. Well worth reading end to end.. its been a long time in the making:

    http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...r-project.html

  3. #13
    Cool...FYI when R7 was owned by Gregg it was in Brumos livery raced at Watkins Glen Can Am and 6 hour and when Rabaque owned it it was in Café Mexico/Viceroy livery raced at Le Mans. But with totally different long tail configuration.
    Last edited by sanders; 04-08-2020 at 02:40 PM.

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Orange County, California
    Posts
    487
    There is a gentleman in Japan who is producing and selling limited (fiberglass) sets which include rear fenders, deck lid, and rear bumper for approximately $9k.
    1957 356A Cab Condor Yellow
    1970 911E Targa “CONDA G”
    1970 911T3.2 “Meatballs”
    1972 911T2.5 “AWBRGN”
    1972 911T Targa Glaserblau
    1976 911S Talbot Yellow

  5. #15
    Lighting Specialist jaudette3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Bend, Oregon
    Posts
    4,267
    Mary Stuart RSR Homage

    I’ve been in touch with the owner of the one original Mary Stuart RSR in the world (the one in the Porsche museum is a replica) and he has graciously agreed to provide this builder with any information he might need for his build. This is going to be a top of the world homage car!

    Cheers,
    John
    Lighting Resources for Hardcore Air-Cooled Porsche Enthusiasts”
    ——-
    John Audette - Porsche Lighting Anorak
    AC Shop: BEST-IN-CLASS Air Cooled 911 Lighting Parts => 911BestInClass.com
    AC Site: The Air Cooled 911 Light Resource => AudetteCollection.com
    Instagram: Please Follow => AC Shop Instagram

  6. #16
    Senior Member michaelaiellosr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    New York/Florida
    Posts
    384
    Quote Originally Posted by patrick911 View Post
    This topic is an interesting one if you're interested in the Martini RSRs and from post 10 & 16 onward there's a bit of info on the Mary Stuart tail.
    In short, during the season they found they needed more downforce than the ducktail could provide, so whereas they had the cobbled on metal side plates at the Targa Florio, this improved to the what's now called the Mary Stuart tail/collar for the Le Mans race and later races that season.
    Together with the improved downforce on the rear, they also added a lower bit to the front spoiler to reduce lift and the flares where wider to increase the already huge 11" rear wheels to what I believe were 13" centre lock wheels. It reduced top speed but provided added downforce for faster cornering.

    The #46 car (9113600686 / R7) was modified together with R6 (9113600588) Targa Florio winning car (#47 at Le Mans) as can be seen in the Teloche garage picture above.
    The R6 car was in that look for a long time (when Kitchak owned the car) and only recently has been restored back in the earlier Targa Florio winning look with the side skirts.

    I know that Zuffenhaus was doing a replica, in the end even using carbon for the Mary Stuart tail, and no doubt there will be more copies around.
    It was probably understood by the factory and later analysis confirmed that the sugar scoop acted more as a spoiler, reducing lift, rather than adding any downforce. Technical aero knowledge at the time in its infancy, mechanics and "engineers" used the cut and try method . Not knowing what if any success this car had those responsible for it no doubt were willing to try anything to achieve some at the rear and did so at the expense of serious drag, maybe hoping that the trade off would work. Its strange why somebody would want to pay so much for homage to what is a curiosity , an oddity, as opposed to a racing legacy car.

  7. #17
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    The aero work designing the "Mary Stuart" tail (and associated deep chin spoiler) was actually done on R2 at the Stuttgart wind tunnel in JANUARY 1973 - months before it ever appeared on the race track (and even before the RSR cars were debuted at Daytona). So when they were at the Monza race (the first time that tail appeared) on April 25 1973 they had all the design parameter locked in but had never tested it in a race. As those Martini cars were mobile test beds they used it (as a last minute change to the configuration after practice during the race weekend) on both R6 and R8 which were forced to run as prototypes as Bonomelli had protested both Martini cars (on their revised rear suspension pick up points) forcing them to run in prototype class.

    It was also used on 6 May at the Spa 1000kms on R7 (not R6 as Haul has posted above as the cars are wrongly identified in both books and the race records at the time but Singers notes from the time show it was really R7 - let alone that it was impossible to be at Spa at that weekend between it being at Monza just before and the Targa just after and looking slightly different with details such as rear vision mirrors etc not matching apart of course from the two completely different types of Mary Stuart tails) .

    That design was carried over to the Targa Florio a couple of weeks later and then evolved further at Nurburgring and Le Mans that year.
    Last edited by HughH; 04-22-2020 at 01:30 AM.
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  8. #18
    Senior Member haul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    bavaria
    Posts
    2,333
    corrected my entry as Hugh has different infos on the car participating im
    Spa....

    but wondering:
    VIN 911 360 0576 R5
    Start numer 40 with Follmer / Jöst
    10th overall
    also did participate in Spa?
    are these entries correct?
    59 750 pre unit triton
    63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
    70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
    65 912 slate gray "erwin"
    73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
    erwin_loves_polo

  9. #19
    Jeff H.
    72 911
    914-6 GT

  10. #20
    Senior Member patrick911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    529
    Apologies for taking this off-topic somewhat, but Hugh, regarding:

    Quote Originally Posted by HughH View Post
    (...) not R6 as Haul has posted above as the cars are wrongly identified in both books and the race records at the time but Singers notes from the time show it was really R7 - let alone that it was impossible to be at Spa at that weekend between it being at Monza just before and the Targa just after and looking slightly different with details such as rear vision mirrors etc not matching apart of course from the two completely different types of Mary Stuart tails) (...)
    My notes, and what i shared in my #8 RSR build project post, indicate that R6 was at Spa the week before, as #40, with a yellow lip front spoiler, but without a collar/Mary Stuart tail, driven by Follmer & Joest. Are you saying that table is wrong?
    (If so I'll change it because otherwise errors keep on reproduced - like I may have done inadvertently.)

    EDIT: After Hugh confirmed that R6 was not in Spa in April - I've updated the corresponding table and post in my topic.

    Cheers,
    Patrick
    Last edited by patrick911; 04-22-2020 at 04:43 PM. Reason: new facts - comment added to avoid confusion
    Member #3508
    1973 911 2.4T
    1976 911S -> 2.8RSR replica
    "if nothing goes right, go left!"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.