Since I didn’t have Pete’s email currently.

Pete, I really love the concept of 000 Magazine, and want it to succeed.
Most of the articles are great.

However, two things are bothering me:

1. There have been fairly obvious technical mistakes in the articles. Take the most recent article that references 1973 RS’s. It’s not true for example that the lightweight option car had different steel or glass than the touring. When you allow errors like that it it takes away from the credibility of the other articles too.

2. Don’t go in the direction of Architectural Digest which no longer writes on great architecture but rather selects houses based on celebrity ownership. Always choose the most interesting car.

Overall, it’s a great effort and well worth subscribing too.

Please eliminate the errors though. And publish corrections of errors if they slip through.