Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Lightweight SWB: Undercoating or no undercoat?

  1. #1

    Lightweight SWB: Undercoating or no undercoat?

    I am falling deep down the slippery slope of a lightweight SWB project and currently the chassis is off being cleaned and dipped in Oregon. I am doing EB Motorsports fiberglass front fenders, bumper, hood, rear bumper, and deck lid. I will also do lightweight perlon carpet. My question is whether or not to do undercoating or simply paint the bottom of the chassis body color. This car will be 99% street with spirited driving. I know shaving ounces off a car using and it for street driving is like taking crazy pills but I have already started and there is no going back. Is the car going to sound like a tin can inside without undercoating or is it going to sound like that even with undercoating? I would greatly appreciate any opinions or feedback!

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    533
    Black chassis lawyer like factory race car...you can add a thin film of wax...but nothing else
    Porsche 911 S 1971 Kremer race car

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    2,564
    Absolutely undercoat the bottom and the wheel wells. You'll regret it if you don't. You don't have to go as thick as the factory did. I do a medium coat.
    72S, 72T now ST

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Longballa View Post
    Absolutely undercoat the bottom and the wheel wells. You'll regret it if you don't. You don't have to go as thick as the factory did. I do a medium coat.
    Enough said! Sounds like the small weight penalty is worth it and I can always just drill a few more holes!

  5. #5
    I removed mine and never regretted it. Most of noise is from open intakes and then open exhaust. If you want a quiet car then get a Lexus.

    Name:  1.jpg
Views: 317
Size:  93.6 KB
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Corvallis, OR
    Posts
    2,564
    To each there own but even the Hot Rods I build with medium undercoat you can here the rocks coming up with sticky tires. Take a poll I guess. I could see no undercoat for a track rat but I'll never do it for a street rod.
    72S, 72T now ST

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    281
    If I had one Porsche and it was always driven on the street -- I'd be in the no undercoat street rat camp. I have a 1989 944S2 race car, It's seam welded, strung out on crystal, and no coatings expect paint and patina. I used to drive the car stock and then it evolved into a race car. A car communicates differently with you when you remove the undercoat and when you drive it -- the viceral explosion of driving takes the driving experience to a diff level, especially if you are running headers with no heat and more specially if you have a 67s on Sterroids like Pauls.

  8. #8
    Exactly, a car built for "spirited driving" is more alive when you hear all aspects talking to you. Save your music listening and chatty conversations for your Lexus.

    I believe a sports-purpose, SWB 911 should be: visceral, urgent and responsive. Chips and imperfections from driving are well-earned patina.
    Paul Abbott
    Early S Member #18
    Weber service specialist
    www.PerformanceOriented.com
    info@PerformanceOriented.com
    530.520.5816

  9. #9
    Senior Member NickP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Solana Beach, CA
    Posts
    1,222
    When Scott built and painted my ST he put his medium coat of undercoating on the underside and wheel wells. My car is used mostly on the street for weekend back country runs, group rallies (street), around town once in a while and 4-5 track days per year. That means most of my miles are on the street and I’m happy with the set up. It would be much louder and I think uncomfortably so without some degree of sound dampening and protection from the undercoating. In particular, if you are running TB15’s they throw up so many rocks and debris in the wheel wells I think it would irritate the sh*t out of me if there was no undercoating. At the end of the day it really depends how you use you car and what floats your boat. My 2 cents...

    Nick
    Nick Psyllos
    S Reg & R Gruppe
    1973 Euro 911S
    1972 911T to ST

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by NickP View Post
    When Scott built and painted my ST he put his medium coat of undercoating on the underside and wheel wells. My car is used mostly on the street for weekend back country runs, group rallies (street), around town once in a while and 4-5 track days per year. That means most of my miles are on the street and I’m happy with the set up. It would be much louder and I think uncomfortably so without some degree of sound dampening and protection from the undercoating. In particular, if you are running TB15’s they throw up so many rocks and debris in the wheel wells I think it would irritate the sh*t out of me if there was no undercoating. At the end of the day it really depends how you use you car and what floats your boat. My 2 cents...

    Nick
    At some point this car will be your neighbor on Solana Circle so you can see the final product!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.