Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Any 68 L or S engaged in Le Mans 24 hours ?

  1. #1
    Xavier Petit-Jean-Boret Xavier PJB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,476

    Any 68 L or S engaged in Le Mans 24 hours ?

    Greetings,
    Looking for information about 1968 SWB 911L or S being engaged in 24 hours if Le Mans.

    I searched google etc.. but in 68 it appears that only T models for 911 and 69 some S but wonder if they are LWB or SWB hard to tell on some found pics.

    Any help, appreciated

    Cheers
    Xavier
    O-G 26 - Early911S 2407

  2. #2
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,448
    Xavier,

    Yes there was...

    In the Pascal book he list two 911S's out of the 4 911's that ran the race...

    #43 driven by Gaban and Vanderschriek, came in 12th in distance and 15th in the index of performance...

    #44 driven by Chasseuil and Ballot Lena, the engine failed 15 mins before the end of the race...

    Hope this helps,
    Chuck
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  3. #3
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    Hi Chuck

    i think BOTH of those cars, while they had 911S engines , were actually TR's. I am fairly sure #44 was 118 2 0779 and it ran again in 69 (again as #44) as did the Gaban car as car #41

    however car #67 at the 1969 Le Mans was 11800120 a 911S with a 911/22 engine registered 18VQ 75 and went on to be car #67 in 1970 (and le mans 71 car #65 and Spa #50 in 1972) and still around in Germany last I heard
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  4. #4
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,448

    Thumbs up

    Well there you have it.....

    Hugh, thanks for the 'deep dive' clarification...

    Found the same car in '69 and '70 in the book as you mentioned...

    You are da'man…

    Cheers,
    cm
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  5. #5
    Xavier Petit-Jean-Boret Xavier PJB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,476
    All right then, thank you gentlemen ! So a 911S swb ran in Le Mans in 69...need to deep dive that car...and start a great project indeed.
    O-G 26 - Early911S 2407

  6. #6
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    Xavier sent you a Pm
    I think it will be easy to research
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  7. #7
    Senior Member gulf908's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,154
    Xavier

    From the 1968 Sports Purposes pages -

    911 and 911 L = group 2 touring cars - therefore unable to race at Le Mans '68
    911 T and 911 S = group 3 GT 2 litres - 4 x 911 T listed in Automobile year - 2 finished and 2 didn't - and no 911 S

    as a generalisation,the T was used as a rally car with the S motor and the S was used as a full race track car

    HTH
    Dennis
    1970 914-6 - materialised from the 'Lotto' garage into reality
    1971 2.2 911 S - now back in the UK - sob!
    1975 Carrera Targa (ROW) - missed.
    One of us is fast becoming a valuable antique.
    S Registry member 536
    Australian TYP 901 Register Member 44

  8. #8
    Senior Member RennTyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oxford, UK
    Posts
    301
    Quote Originally Posted by gulf908 View Post
    Xavier

    From the 1968 Sports Purposes pages -

    911 and 911 L = group 2 touring cars - therefore unable to race at Le Mans '68
    911 T and 911 S = group 3 GT 2 litres - 4 x 911 T listed in Automobile year - 2 finished and 2 didn't - and no 911 S

    as a generalisation,the T was used as a rally car with the S motor and the S was used as a full race track car

    HTH
    Dennis
    Not so sure about that. The factory entries at Le Mans in 68 were all 911T for a reason - they could run at the T's homologated weight of 923kg versus the S at 975kg. The cars were "T" in name only. In most other respects they were as close as the regs would allow them to get to a 911R. Every car was bespoke and no two were exactly the same.
    Early 911S Registry #888

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.