Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: LWB front suspension and brakes

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239

    LWB front suspension and brakes

    I did not find a previous thread so started this one. I am not certain of exactly what combinations of struts, hubs, calipers, and rotors were standard on which models, and what the upgrades were for each. What I want to do after establishing a base set is to document the options available to upgrade.
    M103 is an option for at least the 911T to upgrade to Koni shocks all around; supposed to be available 1970 & 71. M402 succeeded M103 for 1972 and applied to 911T & E for a price of $83 and M402 for 911S cost $41. I am guessing from the pricing that the brake calipers were upgraded also; thus they got the S calipers.
    Note that these prices are a differential price between the new parts and those they replace. Many options are priced this way except those where there is nothing to replace.

    A couple of questions. Did the 911T get solid rotors with unspaced M calipers front and/or rear? If solid rotors on the front, were the hubs different? If solid rotors on the front, was there an option to upgrade to vented rotors and spaced calipers? When did vented front rotors become standard on all models? When did vented rear rotors become standard on all models? The 912E can be included in this discussion.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  2. #2
    Senior Member Scott A's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    South East USA
    Posts
    903
    In this book I have from 1976.
    It stated, vented disc standard on T for 2.2 cars.
    Name:  3FAF8267-E68B-443F-9997-25EA8F11C907.jpg
Views: 278
Size:  142.8 KB

    And for fun. It stated. First vented came on S (don't know about racing cars)
    Name:  798CA2ED-E5CB-4685-9D16-791B0986BCED.jpg
Views: 273
Size:  129.6 KB

    Name:  9E1BAADE-CBE4-4074-9AF6-636020CD5BF3.jpg
Views: 296
Size:  102.9 KB

    Silly portrait iPhone photos come in sideways

    Current long term ownership: 63 Cab, 71 911, 74 914

  3. #3
    Senior Member raspritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    562
    My USA spec ‘69T has solid rotors and unspaced M calipers front and rear, and pretty sure the same hubs front and rear (will check and update if that is wrong). I have a lot of ‘69 literature I can check as well.
    Rich Spritz

    1959 BMC Huffaker Mk1 Formula Junior racecar
    1967 Porsche 911 racecar
    1969 Porsche 911T
    1970 Winkelmann WDF2 Formula Ford racecar
    1973 Merlyn Mk24 Formula Ford racecar
    2007 Porsche 997C4 cab (totaled by an idiot running a stop sign)
    2014 Porsche 991 TurboS cab
    2019 Cayman GTS (wife's)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239
    Quote Originally Posted by Scott A View Post
    In this book I have from 1976.
    It stated, vented disc standard on T for 2.2 cars.
    And for fun. It stated. First vented came on S (don't know about racing cars)
    Silly portrait iPhone photos come in sideways
    So it appears that 1969 911T, and perhaps 912E were the last to have solid rotors.
    First vented on 1967 911S, and possibly an option for 911.
    Portrait photos are rotated by forum software to fit our screens better.

    These Service Information booklets are very useful for this discussion.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    I did not find a previous thread so started this one. I am not certain of exactly what combinations of struts, hubs, calipers, and rotors were standard on which models, and what the upgrades were for each. What I want to do after establishing a base set is to document the options available to upgrade.
    M103 is an option for at least the 911T to upgrade to Koni shocks all around; supposed to be available 1970 & 71. M402 succeeded M103 for 1972 and applied to 911T & E for a price of $83 and M402 for 911S cost $41. I am guessing from the pricing that the brake calipers were upgraded also; thus they got the S calipers.
    Note that these prices are a differential price between the new parts and those they replace. Many options are priced this way except those where there is nothing to replace.

    A couple of questions. Did the 911T get solid rotors with unspaced M calipers front and/or rear? Yes. 911s and 912s never got vented on one end and non vented on the other end. The only Porsche that got that was a 914/6 that got vented (M calipers) and non vented rears.
    If solid rotors on the front, were the hubs different? No. The hubs were the same
    If solid rotors on the front, was there an option to upgrade to vented rotors and spaced calipers? I think so, but can't say for sure
    When did vented front rotors become standard on all models? 1970
    When did vented rear rotors become standard on all models? 1970
    The 912E can be included in this discussion.
    The 912E used non vented rotors from a 69 911T. They did get A calipers on the front (with no spacer) with 3.5" bolt spacing, though.

    Regards

    Jim
    Trust but verify
    Last edited by Jim Breazeale; 07-16-2020 at 03:33 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239
    Thanks Jim, that answers a lot of questions. Let me think up a few more. I am still trying to puzzle out the 3" Koni with M caliper vs the 3.5" Koni with S caliper. I have the M103 option for 1970 & 1971 followed by the M402 in 1972 for Koni all around. One 1970 911T with M103 has 3.5" Koni with S caliper; I am fairly convinced this is original since strut are week 7/70 and the car is an 03/70 completion. If correct, then I still have to find the option for the 3" Koni with M caliper; I am not sure of the period where this option was available.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    Thanks Jim, that answers a lot of questions. Let me think up a few more. I am still trying to puzzle out the 3" Koni with M caliper vs the 3.5" Koni with S caliper. I have the M103 option for 1970 & 1971 followed by the M402 in 1972 for Koni all around. One 1970 911T with M103 has 3.5" Koni with S caliper; I am fairly convinced this is original since strut are week 7/70 and the car is an 03/70 completion. If correct, then I still have to find the option for the 3" Koni with M caliper; I am not sure of the period where this option was available.
    You are not thinking of SWB stuff, are you?

    Regards

    Jim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.