Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: '65 non-adjustable strut suspension-- what can be done?

  1. #1
    Senior Member eaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    DC/Montana
    Posts
    509

    '65 non-adjustable strut suspension-- what can be done?

    I have a '65 built 912 with a 2.2 T engine. Winter is coming (we think about this earlier than most in Montana), and I'm in the early stages of planning a winter project. I'd like some brakes that give a bit more confidence and a suspension rebuild. The car feels very twitchy at above 60. The front has the early non-adjustable strut (single bolt at tower). I don't intend to track the car, so I don't think changing the towers is the way to go for me. How far can I go in improving the suspension and brakes while utilizing the suspension I have? Or is this a fool's errand?

    Thanks for any help you can give.

    Joe
    '66 912 with a 2.2
    '62 Lotus Seven S2
    '66 Lotus Elan
    '63 Karmann Ghia convertible
    '76 Alfa Spider

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    edmond, OK
    Posts
    165
    I would post this question to the 912 registry as well. https://www.912bbs.org/forum/
    eric

  3. #3
    Senior Member haul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    bavaria
    Posts
    2,333
    Are your tower shocks already reworked?
    https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...one-at-factory
    59 750 pre unit triton
    63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
    70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
    65 912 slate gray "erwin"
    73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
    erwin_loves_polo

  4. #4
    Senior Member 9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Adelaide Australia
    Posts
    831
    Elephant racing and Rebel both sell an adjustable lower ball joint that enables you to get some decent degrees of negative camber up front.
    https://www.rsrproducts.com/product-...89-911-912-930

  5. #5
    Senior Member Chris Pomares's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    2,093
    Here it is on my 67. They make one to fit SWB and LWB struts on a SWB car. The ones pictures are for LWB struts.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    1959 Auratium Green 356A Super w/ Rudge wheels
    1970 Irish Green 914-6 w/2.2S
    Current -1967 Bahama Yellow 912 POLO 2cam4 #1
    www.reSeeWorks.com
    Personalized Vintage Porsche's and parts
    I couldn't find the sports car of my dreams, so I built it myself-Ferdinand Porsche

  6. #6
    Senior Member raspritz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    562
    I'm sorry to be wet blanket, but if there is either something very wrong with your car or with your driving. I race a ex-'67 912 converted to a 911 with a 2.0 E/S full race engine, and it feels rock-solid at speeds routinely up to 130 MPH. The stock 912 front suspension is spectacular (though better shocks and front and rear swaybars don't hurt), and stock 912 brakes will handle all you can throw at them and much more (I race with Pagid orange pads, which you definitely do not want for street use). If your car feels "very twitchy" at speeds over 60 MPH, something is likely broken or you have a major set-up problem. Make sure no suspension or steering components are broken or worn out, that your frame isn't broken, and that you have good alignment and corner balancing, and that your tires aren't flat-spotted or worn out. Upgrades are not the answer.
    Rich Spritz

    1959 BMC Huffaker Mk1 Formula Junior racecar
    1967 Porsche 911 racecar
    1969 Porsche 911T
    1970 Winkelmann WDF2 Formula Ford racecar
    1973 Merlyn Mk24 Formula Ford racecar
    2007 Porsche 997C4 cab (totaled by an idiot running a stop sign)
    2014 Porsche 991 TurboS cab
    2019 Cayman GTS (wife's)

  7. #7
    Senior Member bob joyce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    el sobrante ca.
    Posts
    1,166
    just for fun .... i would suspect the rear alignment ...If you are driving on the freeway, and you jerk the wheel to either side. the rear of the car should seamlessly follow. I you jerk the wheel, and the rear of the car kind of fishtails and seeks its true direction.... that means the rear is not aligned...
    also on windy days the car will feel as you say.... if it is not properly aligned ...
    Last edited by bob joyce; 08-15-2020 at 08:22 PM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member eaton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    DC/Montana
    Posts
    509
    Thanks for the tips. The towers are reworked. My plan is to go to through the components to check for wear/replace and then go have a good alignment and corner balancing. While I'm in there, I'll add the adjustable ball joints and adjustable spring plates.
    '66 912 with a 2.2
    '62 Lotus Seven S2
    '66 Lotus Elan
    '63 Karmann Ghia convertible
    '76 Alfa Spider

  9. #9
    Senior Member Haasman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    N.Calif., south of SF
    Posts
    1,967
    Joe,

    Does the front bumper contain the ballast weight that's molded into it. Missing, the early SWB cars a a mess to handle. I tried running my earlier car without it and wow, scary.

    Remarkably I had dinner with Helmut Bott years ado. I share that I had an early car, he asked for the Vin number. He then asked if the front weight were in place? I assured him it was. He looked relieved.
    Haasman

    Registry #2489
    R Gruppe #722
    65 911 #302580
    70 914-6 #9140431874
    73 911s #9113300709

  10. #10
    Eaton,
    after driving, club racing and enjoying this 1964 car for 31 years I can say your car has problems that you have to find and fix.

    First: how solid is the pan? If there is any rust at or near major attachment points, the metal can be moving. (After purchasing this car I drove it for two months with similar handling as you describe on yours. Starting the restoration, after those two months, was the first time I jacked the car, all four tires in the air. Some thing was not right, as I jacked the body moved up but the front wheels barley moved. Got under the car and the front torsion bar attachment was hanging in mid air. I broke out in a cold sweat. The rust was so prevalent. There was also thru rust at the rear of the torsion bar mounts near the back of the gas tank. Along with pans and rockers there had been dubious quality prior repairs.)

    Yes get your car on an alignment rack - are the wheels all facing forward?. And, verify the corner balance. If a prior owner thought they could just crank away on the front torsion bar to set the ride height you could have a three legged dog handling.... sound familiar?

    As you gain experience driving you can try different settings. For the street I had the front weights, also drove many years without the front weights. When driving across the country to race, the front bumper fitted was fiberglass and paired with a ducktail - no front weights. It had a front shock tower brace bolted in. As the wheels got wider 4.5" to 5.5" to 6" and the compound got softer alignments were tweeked and the need for the front weights were not needed. Race weight with a 1/2 tank gas was 2020 lbs.

    When the 4.5" chrome wheels went back on the weights went back in.

    Good luck. If your car is anything like the one I had you will love it.
    Attached Images Attached Images     
    Bob
    Early S Reg #370

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.