Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 65

Thread: What weight did the ST Repsol brothers have?

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Le Mans, France
    Posts
    1,102
    To my knowledge, these cars, in France, were never registered as 911 ST, but as regular 911 S. It may be in different in Spain, as they were imported as pure racing cars, according to the article.

  2. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by 928cs View Post
    To my knowledge, these cars, in France, were never registered as 911 ST, but as regular 911 S. It may be in different in Spain, as they were imported as pure racing cars, according to the article.
    I thought so until now. They are never inscribed as 911 ST. The word "Never" should be deleted from the Porsche vocabulary ...
    This is the information that Spain traffic shows about 1151.

    Name:  129427607_420757969103411_3150788018912371522_n (1).jpg
Views: 545
Size:  42.1 KB

    of 49 there are no results so that chassis has never been registered in Spain!

  3. #33
    The first registration in Spain of the vehicle 1151 is in 2001. Does anyone know what year was this car outside of Spain? I think the vehicle was stored and without registration until the time of an alleged export. * this assumption is surely wrong
    The registration of the car in Spain is H0548BBB.
    Registered for the first time in 2001 and as a historic vehicle.

  4. #34
    Name:  vy5e6w (1).jpg
Views: 570
Size:  66.7 KBName:  leon de cos.jpg
Views: 581
Size:  67.7 KB

    The pilot (Dep) Leon De Cos
    looking if it is related to S / T vehicles.

    Are these two images the same color scheme? The back in an image is painted black and the stickers have changed the angle a bit apart from the disappearance of the "puma" on the back (this may be due to a photographic defect) of little importance ..... It is cited that this vehicle is the 1151!
    http://misporschesaescala.blogspot.c...l#comment-form

    Name:  supuestoleondecos.jpg
Views: 556
Size:  162.4 KB
    Last edited by _gonbau; 12-04-2020 at 04:17 AM.

  5. #35
    Why was the S / T 1151 restored with the appearance of the 49? In all the photos I have seen I have noticed a detail that differentiates them. The placement of the front boot locks. If I see the current photos it is seen that the positions are adjusted to those of the license plate 428-z-9743 which corresponds to vehicle 49 (the supposedly destroyed)
    ... Having several photos, why not respect that distinctive "touch" between vehicles? Regulation?
    Name:  cierrescapo.jpg
Views: 512
Size:  55.4 KB
    Name:  color.jpg
Views: 494
Size:  63.2 KB
    the identification image may be confused *








    +

    Name:  sinfranjamismocoche.jpg
Views: 474
Size:  50.6 KB

    absence of black stripe on front spoiler. 1971? Same car in the images.

    VIN 49

    +

    Name:  perdidaenganche.jpg
Views: 462
Size:  66.9 KB

    loss of one of the bonnet hooks
    I think it's chassis 1151------------------------->I now think that it is chassis 49. If we look at the upper strip on the glass we will see that in the black and white photos the red is reflected as a black strip and the blue as a clearer strip.
    +
    Name:  identificacion.jpg
Views: 445
Size:  82.9 KB
    Red and Blue stripes on top of front glass



    +

    Name:  1972 rally de la lana.jpg
Views: 441
Size:  60.6 KB

    in this image shown more back page. We see a ST repsol with a Blue stripe on the front glass. If we follow this, we would see that it would be chassis 49. If we look at the bonnet grips we could see that it could also be 51. I have noted the photo as Lana Rey 1972. As seen in the previous photo at some point she lost the hood closure vehicle 51.


    +

    Name:  b-PD5_7661.jpg
Views: 458
Size:  95.5 KB
    https://newsroom.porsche.com/es_ES/h...psol-9021.html

    Why does "the replica" have a gasoline inlet on the hood?



    Last edited by _gonbau; 12-08-2020 at 05:17 AM. Reason: add more info 8/12/20

  6. #36
    they are not the same race. That black stripe that we see on the front extension corresponds to a body modification or does it correspond to a color scheme? I think it is an extension? I'm wrong?

    Name:  hg71001 (1).jpg
Views: 451
Size:  56.8 KBName:  lineanegraSautoEnrique_image018.jpg
Views: 443
Size:  77.0 KB
    +

    Name:  posibnle.jpg
Views: 445
Size:  98.6 KB
    This photo would be after the first two? Was that black strip painted white?

    Name:  flaresorg.jpg
Views: 437
Size:  49.1 KB

    originally, the extensions had these forms. Obviously, races later can be deformed! I have not got an image of any ST repsol with damage except for the image in which a hood hook is missing!
    Last edited by _gonbau; 12-09-2020 at 03:30 AM.

  7. #37
    No colored stripe at the top of the front glass.

    Name:  14908282_1804580736487600_4324982412988462699_n (1).jpg
Views: 397
Size:  52.2 KB

  8. #38

  9. #39
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,418
    NICE pic !!!!
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    Sunny Scottsdale, Arizona
    Posts
    106
    Wanted to reaffirm what gonbau guessed at. Red does register as black or nearly black in b/w grayscale photography. There is a very light shade of sky blue known as non-photo blue which registers as white in b/w photography. It should be a safe bet the red window strip may appear darker than a lighter blue window strip in period b/w photographs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.