Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 65 of 65

Thread: What weight did the ST Repsol brothers have?

  1. #61
    Name:  BorraganJavier_image046.jpg
Views: 283
Size:  67.4 KB
    is this vehicle the S/T 51? Are the windshield wiper arms working... or did they change their orientation?

  2. #62
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,714
    Quote Originally Posted by _gonbau View Post
    ..... who was in charge of this restoration? Was it done in Porsche?
    it was never restored....

  3. #63
    I spoke to the person who registered the vehicle named Santiago in 2001 as an ST and as a diesel with the historical registration that I have shown above. He did not know how to answer why register it as a diesel, nor what support he used to register it as ST... since when I asked him, he does not remember the car nor does he have registrations by registration or vin in his company data, he did not know who Eladio was either . To finish commenting that the company is a classic vehicle rental and restoration company, they also took care of the paperwork etc... He also made an effort to find out where he had gotten the information from, in which report his name appeared regarding that vehicle .. salds

    +
    https://www.jas.es/7977-19-53-notici...7PAOjPAnVt1TS0

    Good stories about the vehicles on the next page.
    Name:  345446603_790123815658500_3811856090199724885_n.jpg
Views: 202
Size:  105.3 KBName:  images-stories-kwa-kwa-1972-zagranica-rajdy-inne-hiszpania-3.-13-rallye-vasco-navarro-1doncel-44.jpg
Views: 214
Size:  49.7 KB
    Same license plate, same hood closures, different upper stripe.
    Last edited by _gonbau; 05-11-2023 at 10:07 AM.

  4. #64
    How common was it for that year for the same vehicle to exist, the kardex as shown above and also a construction sheet? Both, to define the same vehicle
    Name:  kardex.jpg
Views: 208
Size:  22.3 KBName:  1681831466839.jpeg
Views: 211
Size:  54.7 KB

  5. #65
    Name:  345055520_642133534400605_3140923215947747387_n.jpg
Views: 79
Size:  83.6 KBName:  345889442_629869105865222_7631751938712161285_n.jpg
Views: 77
Size:  111.0 KBName:  345903927_764631978462788_8801501097884251065_n.jpg
Views: 77
Size:  114.0 KBName:  346048497_946568663253765_4605764238652377111_n.jpg
Views: 78
Size:  88.6 KBName:  346077707_2373074946205522_1287879148629257066_n.jpg
Views: 77
Size:  106.0 KBName:  346256000_164198149939517_8023580854971896525_n.jpg
Views: 76
Size:  120.3 KB
    https://www.facebook.com/JASInfoService/photos

    According to the documentation that we have seen about these vehicles, and without passing judgment on it... When looking at the documentation and strictly adhering to it, it is understood that there is a lightweight chassis, the 49, and according to another document, it is understood that the 51 has subsequently made engine improvements. Could lightweight parts be equipped before delivery? I want to ask, based on the documents we have seen from Porsche, is the lightness of the chassis clear in both or only in the 49?*and engine...only 51?
    Initially, where does the story come from that these vehicles were IDENTICAL siblings? Without any difference in engine or chassis?... from Spain? Or does it come from the factory?
    Last edited by _gonbau; 11-03-2023 at 02:22 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.