Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 35 of 35

Thread: Mecanical vs Hydraulic tensioner

  1. #31
    Xavier Petit-Jean-Boret Xavier PJB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    France
    Posts
    3,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    Xavier, as you can see your tensioners were already upgraded to the 930 type, and you did not have the original 68 versions.
    Also your chain ramps have been upgraded, and from one large bronze bushing I see it's likely the idler arms have been too.

    The safety collars should have 3.5 mm of clearance from the tensioner housing, and if that's not possible then it's recommended not to install them.
    Ravi's safety collar looks quite close to the tensioner housing, for a presumably cold engine. For reference, the hex in the collar's screw heads is roughly 3 mm.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

    Thank you will remember this guideline.
    All the best
    O-G 26 - Early911S 2407

  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,903
    Quote Originally Posted by Xavier PJB View Post
    Thank you will remember this guideline.
    All the best
    Xavier

    Your kit includes the spacer to set the distance from the collar to the tensioner housing.
    Tom Butler
    1973 RSR Clone
    1970 911E
    914-6 GT Clone in Progress

  3. #33
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Ramstein area, Germany
    Posts
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by 66S View Post
    I like the real bulletproof feeling with solid chain tensioners, no hydraulic tensioner can be called bulletproof, reliable yes IMHO. Sometimes you have to wait for the chains to stretch on a newly rebuilt motor before the collars can be installed. Your 68 motor can use pressure fed tensioners. New hydraulic tensioners are not inexpensive these days, solids are.
    I think people do often forget why the hydraulic tensioner is developed. A normal spring tensioner has at any temperature nearly the same force of tensioning. A hydraulic tensioner lefts tensioningforce while becoming hotter, caused by a loss of viscosity of the hydraulic fluid.

    So, the most tensioning force is necessary when the engine is cold and all the mechanical parts are not enlarged by heat. After becoming warm the mechanical elements enlarge and the distances from one element to the other “grows”.
    If you have in that situation the same force tensioning the chain ( mechanical tensioner ) this force will be delegated to the different elements of the camshaftdrive, with the result of more wearing of the bushings, bearings, gearwheels and the chain itself.

    So the hydraulic tensioner is developed and used to prevent wearing

    Competition engines have their own rules. Wearing is no argument because these engines are constructed for highest performance and normally overhauled in little periods.

    The backup system with the security collars is smart.

    An interesting technical solution offers the Alfa Romeo V6 engine of the GTV6 which has a hydraulic tensioner intergrated in the normal oil circle. A theoretical top solution but with the problem of oil leakage – in that car the oil is leaking on the timing belt. Therefore it was replaced by an mechanical bi-metal tensioner.

    Hope it helps a little

    Best regards

  4. #34
    Senior Member JT912's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Eugene, OR
    Posts
    949
    These are the cup style which I found when I cracked open this engine a few days ago. Looks like the original owner went the route of retrofitting to a mechanical tensioning setup. There have been some interesting surprises on this car.
    Attached Images Attached Images     
    John Thompson

    1966 912. My first car. Bought it Nov. 25, 1988. Still have it.

  5. #35
    Senior Member NorthernThrux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    London, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,258
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    Ravi's safety collar looks quite close to the tensioner housing, for a presumably cold engine. For reference, the hex in the collar's screw heads is roughly 3 mm.

    Good eye. This was after a 150 mile drive, so full operating temperature. Maybe 15 minutes after parking at most. So I'd expect some sag, based on oil viscosity as was mentioned.
    Early 911S Registry # 2395
    1973 Porsche 911S in ivory white 5sp MT
    2015 Porsche Macan S in agate grey 7sp PDK

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.