Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 87 of 87

Thread: major fraud in the classic porsche business in Germany

  1. #81
    Senior Member bob joyce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    el sobrante ca.
    Posts
    1,165
    kinda like going to a movie
    a huge bomber flying over
    bomb drops to ground
    all you here in the audience is a pop corn fart..................

  2. #82
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,763
    While I don’t know all the ins and outs glad I put “innocent until proven guilty” in many of my comments on this thread about this evolving story given how this has all concluded.

    Imagine it will be rather awkward between Barth and his former employer if they were indeed a co-plaintiff as is being reported by press. However perhaps on balance less uncomfortable than if the court had found guilty of the allegations a man who was so prominent a figure in authenticating so many important Porsche road and race cars for Porsche and its customers over so many years while he was an employee.

    One shadow at least has lifted that had been looming over classic Porsche market with this outcome. I wish all the parties who were vindicated well.

    Steve
    Last edited by 911MRP; 04-15-2024 at 04:51 PM.

  3. #83
    Senior Member patrick911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne, AUS
    Posts
    529
    But hang on, is not proving something vindication?
    Imo, the fact the court or prosecution can't prove the fraud, doesn't automatically mean that the 2 defendants are innocent.
    Member #3508
    1973 911 2.4T
    1976 911S -> 2.8RSR replica
    "if nothing goes right, go left!"

  4. #84
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,763
    Quote Originally Posted by 911MRP View Post
    Innocent until proven guilty
    I don’t know about the facts of this case or about legal processes in Germany but would the above principle not apply like it would if it were trial in England — in Scotland somewhat unusually there is a “not proven” verdict available in some proceedings. There is a wiki page about not proven under Celtic law for those interested in the nuance. However “not guilty” and “not proven” verdict are both an acquittal in Scotland. How does it work in that part of Germany where this trial was held that’s all that matters in this case?

    I imagine if I were a high profile defendant in a case that was dismissed by judge I’d probably claim I’d been vindicated in court.
    Steve
    Last edited by 911MRP; 04-16-2024 at 12:30 AM.

  5. #85
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,714
    Quote Originally Posted by haul View Post
    .but very positive at least for JB- - hopefully he will get some reparation.
    i deeply hope not...i`v seen several of those cars in question...just sad to see how greed destroyed those cars-(some of which at least had an original frame) but incorrect parts everywhere.they used whatever they had in the shelfes or could get for cheap...all built to maximize profit...shame on all of them involved....

  6. #86
    Senior Member Veronica87911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    1,101
    And the other 917-043 is here in Philadelphia at the Simeone Foundation Museum; Daisy (pre accident) is in the background
    Daisy and the Hippie at the Simeone_S.jpg
    Serge

    City of Ben Franklin and Cheesesteaks
    Instagram: Truevisionmediaworks

    Early S Registry #2457
    Daisy: 1972 T with 2.7 engine and Webers
    LOOKING FOR 911 Engine # 6123044

    Rowlf: 2017 Volvo S60 with Polestar Optimization


    Mostro di Biscotti: 1975 Lancia Fulvia 1.3S Series 2

    Veronica: 1987 Carrera coupe - curves in all the right places...SOLD
    Lil' Blue: 2002 Subaru WRX Wagon SOLD

  7. #87
    Early S Reg #1395 LongRanger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    California High Desert
    Posts
    14,364

    Side Hustle

    Quote Originally Posted by rhegra View Post
    . . . No solid evidence has been provided in the trial days so far . . .

    . . . still some haggling in the courtroom about what kind of fine the defendants should be given, as there was at least suspicion of criminal offenses . . .

    . . . The 77-year-old Porsche icon, multiple winner for the luxury brand and later also race director and brand ambassador, was even banned from the premises by Porsche - as a co-plaintiff in the proceedings. At least an apology is probably due
    . . .
    Reputation --- and integrity . . . don't require (or survive?) adjudication

    Being anywhere even CLOSE to a mess like this says enough for me





    Icon, schmicon




    ............................

    .........

    We Can Be Heroes

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.