Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Sonauto expert needed

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,241
    Steve, I have 5 photos of the "BS AU 48" from 1968, 69, 70 & 71. I cannot be sure if these were cars brought into the UK in later years and had to have the tag added then.
    But one, 119300816 owned by Clyde Boyer in Australia was a RHD PCGB delivery.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  2. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,760
    Thanks Dave. Appreciate the reply. Noticed the picture you posted shows a car with the (drainage?) slots in the front slam panel so maybe it had work to replace it because that revised panel with slots was introduced during the 1973 model year. Also heard that for a while the slotted front slam panels were the only version available as replacement in repair network. Might this suggest the car in photo has had a replacement slam panel at some point in its life from 73 on; in which case the aluminium plates might not be representative of it as new? Not knocking the car and maybe these were the original plates. I don’t know — just reading the “footprints in the sand” which might cast doubt on it as exemplar. Maybe I’m wrong and that is the correct slam panel for car of that year on vin and so answered the question? I focus on 72/3; I’m sure folks more expert than me on older cars might chime in.


    Cheers

    Steve
    Last edited by 911MRP; 02-04-2021 at 06:53 PM.

  3. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,241
    Good lord, what are you doing up at this time of the morning Steve? The other 69, a South African delivery does not have the slots, but the 68 also has the slots. I am sure some of the other owners would answer questions. Graham Duplock in UK has the 68, and pgxif in Australia has the other 69.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,760
    Thanks again Dave. While I am confident based on my own observation of many 911 that the BSAU plate appeared roughly coincident with the model year 72 introduction here in U.K. I think the jury is still out on if ( when) it appeared before that year in U.K. (and maybe some commonwealth countries that piggybacked on U.K. regulations) until enough evidence appears. Not saying it didn’t; just not yet proven. The U.K. only entered the common market 1 January 1973 so standards were not harmonised.

    Steve

  5. #25
    Senior Member 911T1971's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    3,008
    Safety belts were commonly mounted by dealers or importers. Some in Switzerland, for example, were VW dealers too so any Porsche often had same belts as any VW, at least in the early stage of safety regulations, early to late 60ies. Nevertheless the factory offered seat belts mounted too..it depended probably on the importer/market structure for each country.

    However, i beleive importer tags were an importer thing and did not interfere with factory settings, at least in Switzerland the amag tag was not mandatory to do on a car, it probably was just an internal number system for id warranty and tracking.
    As for Sonauto, did any imported car (US, japan) and any brand needed to have a (metal) tag?
    I believe it rather was an Importer’s tool, mounting it or not.
    Registry member No.773

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.