Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Fs: @bhcc - 1965 911

  1. 02-08-2021, 08:02 AM #1
    BrentF
    BrentF is offline
    Senior Member BrentF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    784

    Fs: @bhcc - 1965 911

    C819A368-D35C-4CA4-AD12-E68E55F45290.jpghttps://www.beverlyhillscarclub.com/...11-c-11441.htm

    This 1965 Porsche 911 featured here with matching numbers (Certificate of Authenticity included) is available in its factory color combination of Dolphin Grey and a green leatherette interior with Pepita cloth inlays (front seats). It comes equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission, 2.0-liter engine, dual Solex carburetors, and solid wheels. An extremely exciting early 911 that has been sitting for many years waiting to be restored. For $108,500
    Brent
    '70 911S
    '68 TR250
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-08-2021, 10:19 AM #2
    popowitz
    popowitz is offline
    Midnight Runner popowitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West LA
    Posts
    1,004
    I love the color combination of dolphin grey and green leatherette w/ pepita cloth inserts but the only thing holding that car together is good intentions. Not to mention the image looks to be taken from an old family movie. Whomever takes this on is bold indeed.
    Registry Member #1583
    '73 911 S Aubergine (VIN#9113301295)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-08-2021, 10:26 AM #3
    BrentF
    BrentF is offline
    Senior Member BrentF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    784
    Actually the lousy image is a screen shot of my laptop taken by my iPhone. Better quality pictures available on link I provided (to the right of photo).
    Brent
    '70 911S
    '68 TR250
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-08-2021, 10:45 AM #4
    LiveFromNY
    LiveFromNY is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,800
    I was offered this car a few weeks back at $80k (and probably could have bought it cheaper). Tempting for the colors but a money pit for sure. I just don't think current '65 values can support this level of restoration (of course, that isn't stopping me from doing 2 of them right now )
    Last edited by LiveFromNY; 02-08-2021 at 01:06 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 02-08-2021, 10:47 AM #5
    LiveFromNY
    LiveFromNY is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,800
    What's that VIN plate? Am I missing something? Neither of my '65 cars have that.

    65 vin plate.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-08-2021, 11:38 AM #6
    Soterik
    Soterik is offline
    ............. Soterik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Seattle WA
    Posts
    3,516
    Quote Originally Posted by LiveFromNY View Post
    What's that VIN plate? Am I missing something? Neither of my '65 cars have that.

    65 vin plate.jpg
    That's where mine was... I thought that was where they all were for a certain series.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    www.autoforeignservices.com
    autoforeign@gmail.com
    www.early911registry.com
    no pm's....
    RGruppe # 60
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-08-2021, 12:42 PM #7
    Cruisingnkali
    Cruisingnkali is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Orange County, California
    Posts
    487
    Hope someone brings this back...
    1957 356A Cab Condor Yellow
    1970 911E Targa “CONDA G”
    1970 911T3.2 “Meatballs”
    1972 911T2.5 “AWBRGN”
    1972 911T Targa Glaserblau
    1976 911S Talbot Yellow
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 02-08-2021, 02:51 PM #8
    davep
    davep is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239
    Quote Originally Posted by LiveFromNY View Post
    What's that VIN plate? Am I missing something? Neither of my '65 cars have that.
    Then likely you either don't have a 1965 (model year or calendar year), or the car was incorrectly restored. The combination of VIN tag next to the VIN stamp should be there up to about 303300.
    Thus one is 301926
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 02-08-2021, 03:11 PM #9
    LiveFromNY
    LiveFromNY is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3,800
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    Then likely you either don't have a 1965 (model year or calendar year), or the car was incorrectly restored. The combination of VIN tag next to the VIN stamp should be there up to about 303300.
    Thus one is 301926
    I own 301100 and 301331. I'll have to check when I'm at my shop later this week. 301100 is a very original, 2-owner car so I probably just didn't notice the plate. 301331 is a barn (field) find and the plate probably disappeared at some point along the way (like a lot of the car).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 02-08-2021, 03:43 PM #10
    9er
    9er is offline
    Senior Member 9er's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Adelaide Australia
    Posts
    831
    912 from '65

    tag.jpg
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules


Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.