Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: LWB or SWB???

  1. #1

    LWB or SWB???

    RHD footboard....hoping it is LWB - or are they the same?? Anyone know if there is a difference.

    ThanksName:  foot plate.jpg
Views: 671
Size:  76.3 KB

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    232
    Either way - nice FJ40 top :-)
    Looking for a 1967 911S Project!

    My 78 FJ40 Build

  3. #3
    Mmmm...not sure what that means.... any ideas?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    232
    Just saying - it appears to me the white "table" you set the footboard on to take the above photo is a fiberglass top from a Toyota FJ40. I can't help as to the differences between swb/lwb footboard, but can't see why it wouldn't work.
    Looking for a 1967 911S Project!

    My 78 FJ40 Build

  5. #5
    Senior Member ejboyd5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Southold, NY
    Posts
    821
    Don't know anything about RHD, but why would there be any difference between SWB and LWB for an interior piece such as this?

  6. #6
    Senior Member NZVW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    1,770
    I sort of get the impression that perhaps he is wanting to purchase the part and just wants to be sure it is correct for his purposes before paying. M2CW
    Mark

  7. #7
    Cheers Mark...correct..and I don't have one to compare...

  8. #8
    Senior Member dirk07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    3,345
    There had been different SWB,LWB and post73 pedal boards. And some Targa and sportomatic boards as well.
    The post73 boards have a narrower spacing of the upper two mounting holes. You can judge by measuring the spacing in your car.

    Don t know the difference of LWB to SWB.

  9. #9
    Can take a pic of RHD LWB for you on the weekend so you can compare doesn't look like a normal LWB that I am familar with though
    Clyde Boyer





    1973 2.4E Coupe RHD Aussie 5 speed
    1973 2.4E Coupe RHD Aussie 5 speed my first ever 911 (1995)







    Early S Registry Member #294
    First Aussie R Gruppe Member #366
    TYP 901 Register Inc #6

  10. #10
    Cheers Clyde..that would be so useful...my car is a 69 RHD....thanks Matthew

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.