IMG_20220616_131249.jpg
why did the engine look "so new"?
my father says that the vehicle accelerated almost the same as the original of 72... Therefore it is difficult for me to believe that my father would not notice the difference of 40 CV
+
Um... I think this is getting complicated. The heads were manufactured according to date 9/77************um not all, I'm going to check the numbers since I don't have the heads with me right now..
as.jpgas2.jpg287962379_440614587512896_6235287181254993413_n.jpg
Number piece: 9111043450r
+
287879528_779100153462544_8418748826847237622_n.jpg
I must understand from the visual inspection that my pistons are 2.7 normal. Correct? Do they differ visually in the central point among many other things?
+
I have to get to the camshaft and its number to know what I have, right? is there any other method? I understand that the parts that I show in the image are the ones that differ in type 92 and 93. Should I assume (or is it a mistake?) that components of type 93 would have been used? Or can it be any other?
ee.jpg
one of those supposed differences would be between the piece with number 911.105.141.00 and 911.105.143.00
I have left the cylinder heads in the mechanic for the mentioned works. I'll ask if I can stop by and if I can't, send me some photos. I have to tell the mechanic that the cylinder heads are where they are going to be worked on. He told me to let him know and I will. Perhaps there we will draw clearer conclusions on this matter but I am forced to ask... Any special consideration in this case? I was thinking of sticking with the original plan. They make the seats for me and look at everything. There they recommended me "not to change" all the components of the cylinder heads since they saw it as an unnecessary expense. In the same way and although they told me that the valve guides would be fine... I would like to buy them... And I will do it so that they can change them (I understand that they are the same as those of the normal 2.7 although I will review what I say) for another side I wonder... Is it advisable to change all the valves? Since one of the pistons has a mark, one must be "minimally" bent or so I think... Therefore. Change all the valves? Feel free to say what you want! Thank you!!
+
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/911-e...ams-carbs.html
[ATTACH=CONFIG]576476IMG_20220616_183848.jpg[/ATTACH]
IMG_20220616_183812.jpg
+
connecting rods number 911.103.105.0R
+
as3.jpg
+
I have the registration of the vehicle and also a partial copy of the papers of the vehicle from which the engine comes, although it does not say anything relevant or VIN, only the name of the owner and some dates. I would like to ask... to access a record of repairs of a Porsche, of which the Porsche does not exist since it had an accident but the engine does.... How do you ask the Porsche for that?
The piston showing the mark after cleaning shows the number 1 on its head.^notrelevant
Reply With Quote