Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: 2.4 conversation to 2.7

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Norfolk, Va
    Posts
    153
    Buy Bruce Anderson's and Wayne Dempsey's books on performance. Excellent information is detailed there.
    R/Dave

  2. #22
    I think your thought of sticking with the 2.4 CIS is smart. I've had my 73.5 for over 30 years. It is a fantastic, wonderful car to drive and own. Smooth as can be. Reliable. Great torque already. My own observation has been that there are more longterm CIS T owners than other 911s. Yes, they are not as flashy as the E and S to folks on the boards. But to live with, they are magnificent. And as Pete Zimmerman wrote in his book, the 73.5 is the first "10" that Porsche built.

    I've driven lots of Es and Ss over the years. They are absolutely fantastic. But, mixing and matching CIS and non-CIS is a non-starter. Either make it CIS* or start fresh with your case and build a non-CIS car.

    I might add that I've also raced mine at autox's and beaten an S and Es. I'm no great racer. And the courses definitely favored torque. And those other drivers could have just been bad - at least worse than me. But "performance" changes for the use and how you drive it. I'd say a CIS T is still a high performance car for different situations.


    *I circled back with another comment. This all started with you asking about 2.7 P&Cs on a 2.4. One of the critiques about the CIS cars is that they are so balanced from the factory, that it is very hard to mix and match pieces - for improvements or to keep running. I think there is some validity to that. On the other hand, I noticed some others looking for 2.4 CIS P&Cs, and suggestions that they can't be found. Perhaps that is what you are battling here. Before you jump to 2.7 P&Cs, I'd definitely have someone who really knows wear, examine the pistons and the rings lands. I would suggest that you lean towards new cylinders (if needed) and new rings, but not going to 2.7 unless absolutely necessary. I'll bet that new rings will largely be what you need - and should last for a very long time under how the car will be driven now (that is, not as a daily driver doing 100s of miles a week).
    Last edited by Jay Laifman; 10-18-2021 at 08:54 AM.

  3. #23
    My 73S motor with 2.7 RS pistons and cylinders and 46mm PMO carbs runs very well with a nice idle. I have a front mounted oil cooler and no engine mounted cooler just a 993 filter there. On the road on a hot day the oil doesn’t get hot enough to open the factory thermostat in a Troutman housing, it only got hot enough sitting at idle for a long time. I’m not a big fan of CIS, especially at higher rpms.

  4. #24
    Thank you for your observations in this.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.