Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: 2.4 conversation to 2.7

  1. #11
    Some great information on here!
    Very helpful!

    Will keeping the T cams and just opening the ports to 36 and opening up the spigots for 2.7 offer an increase?
    I am not sure I can afford to do everything at once. But could probably add E cams in a few years.

    Can I run E or S cams with CIS? I think I remember reading somewhere this would have some problems.

  2. #12
    E or for sure S cams will have valve interference with CIS pistons. I have never tried 2.7 with 2.4 CIS but I think the stock injection could handle the bore increase. Any one done that?
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    35,000 ft
    Posts
    2,011
    Quote Originally Posted by Allen,N View Post
    Some great information on here!
    Very helpful!

    Will keeping the T cams and just opening the ports to 36 and opening up the spigots for 2.7 offer an increase?
    I am not sure I can afford to do everything at once. But could probably add E cams in a few years.

    Can I run E or S cams with CIS? I think I remember reading somewhere this would have some problems.
    I’ve got a set of E cams that are ready to go.. https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...highlight=cams
    looking for 1972 911t motor XR584, S/N 6121622

  4. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    573
    Don’t use the cis pistons. Use the 2.7rs. They have a better shape dome and will allow you to switch cams/intake if you end up doing so at a later date. My first engine build had these + cis system, cis cams. 36mm ports. Good motor but you always want more. :-)

    While the overlap of E and S cams won’t work with the cis system, there are more performance oriented cams that will work with cis system. Webcam, Elgin and Dougherty racing all make them. Even 964 cams are better than what you have — yours should be able to be reground. Talk to John Dougherty, Dougherty racing cams.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    Personally, if you are going to these heroics, I would consider preserving the 2.4 CIS motor and put it on a pallet for some later time when you (or the new owner) wants to go back to stock. Find a nice 3.0 or 3.2 Liter motor and drop it in.
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by HarryD View Post
    Personally, if you are going to these heroics, I would consider preserving the 2.4 CIS motor and put it on a pallet for some later time when you (or the new owner) wants to go back to stock. Find a nice 3.0 or 3.2 Liter motor and drop it in.
    Yes, I agree. It's such an easy swap for the 3.0 liter, you can even plug in the CIS without much trouble. But you should add a front oil cooler, IMHO.
    Tom F.
    Long Beach, CA

  7. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom F. View Post
    Yes, I agree. It's such an easy swap for the 3.0 liter, you can even plug in the CIS without much trouble. But you should add a front oil cooler, IMHO.
    Front cooler most definitely should be added, just like the factory did.

    My stock 2.4 CIS motor would get too hot (230+) when I did a 20 minute HPDE in the summer. Added factory brass lines and trombone. Seems to be adequate. If not, next will be a Carrera cooler.
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  8. #18
    Thank you for all the knowledge!

    I am leaning at staying at 2.4 and the original CIS.

    I am now considering 2.4 high compression pistons and E or 964 cam. Will this work with the current CIS?
    I have heard it gives ~20HP. Anyone have expert with this?

    One mechanic said the CIS will not work with E cams. He couldn’t explain why. Thoughts?

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,095
    CIS will not work with with Cams that have a lot of overlap such as those used in E or S cams. Also, the dome shape in a CIS piston is unique when compared to other pistons to get the proper swirl of the fuel air mixture.

    If you machinist does not know/understand the why behind these issues, IMHO, I would find one that does.

    This Website may help you understand more about CIS. https://jimsbasementworkshop.com/
    Harry

    Member #789
    1970 VW Sunroof Kombi Bus - "The Magic Bus"
    1973.5 911T Targa for fun - "Smokey"
    2009 MB C300

  10. #20
    A stock piston from a 2.2L 911S with give you a nice compression bump and cleaner combustion chamber, just need to check the skirt to rod clearance that can get tight. You can't use the stock CIS pistons for any update.
    Update the heads (and intake valves) to 36mm S
    Let Glenn Yee update your stock oil pump
    S or Elgin Mod S cams a good choice, others have had great success with E just not my formula
    Throw the CIS into the dumpster and light it on fire, get a good set of PMO's or Webers or even better MFI
    Cole Scrogham
    Porsche Restoration
    911, 912, 911R, RS, RSR, IROC

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.