Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: Throttle Linkage length - 1971

  1. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2024
    Location
    France
    Posts
    5
    To complete the post we found with my mechanic there's 2 Réf. for Throttle Bellcrank / inverted lever, Réf. : 901.423.027.03 (1969) / 901.423.027.02 (1968) which correspond to the same Throttle Linkage Réf. 901.423.026.03 (1969) / 901.423.026.02 (1968)

    There's a difference of length and angle on the lever which explains the difference in length of Throttle Linkage :


    Name:  WhatsApp Image 2024-02-01 at 17.20.32.jpg
Views: 190
Size:  82.1 KB

    Name:  WhatsApp Image 2024-02-01 at 17.20.17.jpg
Views: 193
Size:  84.1 KB

  2. #12
    1969 is a very special year !
    You really have to deal with both 68 and 69 PET...
    And of course Porsche OEM have no clue about it.

  3. #13
    Porsche changed the bell crank leverage when they went to MFI. It was to provide greater leverage for the increased resistance of the MFI throttle system.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  4. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    Porsche changed the bell crank leverage when they went to MFI. It was to provide greater leverage for the increased resistance of the MFI throttle system.
    Hello Ed,
    So you mean all MFI cars should have the bell crank leverage circled in red (even early MFI cars) ???

    Name:  WhatsApp Image 2024-02-01 at 17.20.17.jpg
Views: 158
Size:  171.4 KB

  5. #15
    What you have circled should be for carbs, they have the shorter arms. Less leverage. Is that your .02 bell crank ? I see very few cars that come in that have full throttle. Most people have trouble understanding how a bell crank works. The entire system has to dealt with, starting with the pedal return stop on the pedal cluster, get that wrong and you never get the rest correct.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  6. #16
    Senior Member Simonjjb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Connecticut/Florida
    Posts
    1,388
    Quote Originally Posted by edmayo View Post
    What you have circled should be for carbs, they have the shorter arms. Less leverage. Is that your .02 bell crank ? I see very few cars that come in that have full throttle. Most people have trouble understanding how a bell crank works. The entire system has to dealt with, starting with the pedal return stop on the pedal cluster, get that wrong and you never get the rest correct.
    I learned from Ed that you have to start from the front and work your way back...
    1968 911L Coupe - Golden Green
    1971 911S Coupe - Gemini Blue
    1973 911S Targa - Signal Yellow
    1974 914 2.3 - Sunflower Yellow

  7. #17
    To be clear, when my friend Xhab ordered a throttle linkage .03 it was too long and it was probably because his lever was the .02 (the one which is not circled on the picture).
    So regarding the lenght of those throttle linkage it seems you need the lever circled in red to fit with the .03 throttle linkage.

    But if you say it's for carb, then the truth is elsewhere !!!

  8. #18
    Planning a rehab of the pedal cluster and throttle linkage on my '71 and came across this thread. I was just wondering how best to pop the ball joint apart (is it simple as using some leverage or is there some sort of clip to remove?) but now I'm wondering if I'm getting full throttle. My car has MFI but has the shorter bell crank. It seems to have plenty of power but I don't drive other early 911s, and my car has seen a lot of things over the years that I don't know about. What's the best way to tell if I'm getting full throttle?

    Right now I'm chasing what seems to be excessive friction in the system which I think is either pedal bushings or something to do with the linkage (which looks to be kinked). I'm planning to replace the center tunnel linkage- I had just replaced the bushings (which were missing) the other day but that seemed to make things a bit worse actually.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Flieger; 03-02-2024 at 06:44 PM.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

  9. #19
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    Just a little fyi.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  10. #20
    Oh wow! Which one should I have? It looks like I've got the one on the left.
    1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
    Early 911S Registry Member #425

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.