Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: 1973 RSR Vin verification

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2022

    1973 RSR Vin verification

    Greetings fellow Porsche family members. I am new to your site and from Australia, seeking help to discover the true history of a recent purchase, not my first Porsche, but certainly the one with some mystery attached. It is a March 1973 build, but currently upgraded to a 1974 short bonnet RS look. The Vin suggests it is at least the body of a 1973 RSR, #9113600847, however, I believe a vehicle with the same Vin was enter in the Monterey Motorsport Reunion in 2013. Anyone with any knowledge or suggestions as to how I can verify the true identity please let me know or post comments which may assist.
    Regards, Vic

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2012
    There are several people live in Aus who I would respect on their knowledge of RS maybe they can help as something like that might require in in the metal inspection as not always possible to see details even if you were to post photos

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Burford, ON, Canada
    I can help with leads and original information, but we need to be able to email each other. You have enabled neither PM's nor email yet. You will not be able to send PM's until you have 10 posts. But you may be able to email me by clicking on my username and choosing email. Dave
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2023 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  4. #4
    Some photos would help,what about the production number on the dash.
    Lots of details on a rsr

  5. #5
    Senior Member gulf908's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    any idea who the first owner was ?

    1970 914-6 - materialised from the 'Lotto' garage into reality
    1971 2.2 911 S - now back in the UK - sob!
    1975 Carrera Targa (ROW) - missed.
    One of us is fast becoming a valuable antique.
    S Registry member 536
    Australian TYP 901 Register Member 44

  6. #6
    I referred to the RS book and looked up the options to see if that might give a clue as what to look for on the body. #847 came with only one option, #220, limited slip diff. So not much help. There are still RS/RSR modifications to the body shell you can look for. All the RS and RSR cars have the reinforcement on the rear tunnel where the opening is to connect the transmission to the shift shaft. THe RSR has many more places to look.

  7. #7
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Portland, Oregon
    Is the car listed in the RS book as a 491

  8. #8
    As a matter of fact it did not I don't believe. I'll have to double check.

  9. #9
    I just checked Starkey's book R to RSR and 847 was a real RSR with a lot of documented history.

  10. #10
    Yes, RS book says 491

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.