Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: BMC air filter

  1. #1

    BMC air filter

    In years past I’ve always recommend the BMC air filter element as a replacement for peak performance.
    It would yield a power loss not worth mentioning from T too 2.7 RS engines.

    My latest BMC instalment has been very disappointing in a 2.0E motor with S spec valves yielding 173Hp@7150 without filters. With BMC installed I’m loosing a solid 7Hp .

    Upon closer investigation and comparisons the new BMC is now 1.5” shorter in length and the outside circumference is small by 1.5” thus not giving enough airflow passage and restricting.

    Has anyone purchased the latest K&N lately ? They seem to be getting harder to find as well other than from stoddards. If so could you please provide me the filters dimensions and K&N part number?

    Best, Robert
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Robert D. Groß

  2. #2
    K&N '65-'71 Stock 911 Replacement Air Filter = E-2380, UPC: 024844002730, Suggested List: $110.24

    Dimensions: OD: 5.313", ID: 3.500" Hgt: 8.750"

    K&N Online Store: No longer listed
    Summit, AutoZone: Out Of Stock
    OffRoad Warehouse: $64.99
    NAPA: $74.99
    Stoddard: $85.00

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by JimmyT View Post
    K&N '65-'71 Stock 911 Replacement Air Filter = E-2380, UPC: 024844002730, Suggested List: $110.24

    Dimensions: OD: 5.313", ID: 3.500" Hgt: 8.750"

    K&N Online Store: No longer listed
    Summit, AutoZone: Out Of Stock
    OffRoad Warehouse: $64.99
    NAPA: $74.99
    Stoddard: $85.00
    Thank you Jimmy.
    It Almost seems like the BMC and K&N are made by the same factory. Dimensions are the same and Only the end seals have a different colour.
    I don’t understand why they are making the filter so small. It’s defeating the purpose and at those prices you might as well just stick with stock power sucking Mann filter.

    Regards
    Thanks again for the K&N info.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Robert D. Groß

  4. #4
    How much power is lost via the Mann filter?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Noah View Post
    How much power is lost via the Mann filter?
    I’ll have a 2.7l RS spec motor on the test bench tomorrow.
    I’ll do a comparison test for you with a Mann. I have a K&N on order but it’ll be a week.

    A few years ago I recorded a 8hp drop with a Mann filter.

    I made an error in regards too the Dimensions between BMC and K&N .
    The K&N is the proper length. The new short BMC looses 1.5” of filtering length .
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Robert D. Groß

  6. #6
    I located and ran a K&N filter for comparison today.
    I ran the test with a metal airbox because of the metal stacks. But without any snorkel. A full length snorkel drops power an extra .7hp.
    Tests using a 2.7L RS spec MFI motor.
    Todays HP correction factor is an extra 1.037 too the figures on the screen.
    Test 1 - Mann 214.4 Hp corrected
    Test 2 - K&N. 219.6Hp corrected
    Test 3 - no filter or airbox. 221.8Hp corrected

    Test 3 probably would have gained an extra 1.5hp if I had dropped the AfR to a richer 13.1. It ran leaner because more air was entering for lack of restriction.
    Attached Images Attached Images    
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Robert D. Groß

  7. #7
    Senior Member uai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Horb a.N. Germany
    Posts
    2,563
    If you're just looking for a filter of any make and want to search for dimensions
    There's a link here - I'm driving some filter of an excavator
    https://catalog.mann-filter.com/EU/ger/dimensions
    Name:  1.jpg
Views: 221
Size:  60.3 KB

  8. #8
    Thanks for taking the time to do and share the results of your comparison. That is data that you can believe in.

    Quote Originally Posted by glaverbel911 View Post
    I located and ran a K&N filter for comparison today.
    I ran the test with a metal airbox because of the metal stacks. But without any snorkel. A full length snorkel drops power an extra .7hp.
    Tests using a 2.7L RS spec MFI motor.
    Todays HP correction factor is an extra 1.037 too the figures on the screen.
    Test 1 - Mann 214.4 Hp corrected
    Test 2 - K&N. 219.6Hp corrected
    Test 3 - no filter or airbox. 221.8Hp corrected

    Test 3 probably would have gained an extra 1.5hp if I had dropped the AfR to a richer 13.1. It ran leaner because more air was entering for lack of restriction.

  9. #9
    Thanks for doing that Rob, very interesting. I wouldn't have guessed that since I always thought the stock snorkel/filter setup made the most power. Maybe I need to get a K&N.

  10. #10

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.