Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 901/13 question

  1. #1
    PCaricous Fanaticous G50911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    199

    901/13 question

    hey all. i have 1 901/13 (serial: 7195609) transaxle im thinking of rebuilding. i picked it up years back to use on a build i started. my question is, are all 901 5 speeds doglegs? if not, how can i tell if my box is or not? also it's going in a 67 911 normale with a stock 2.0. it's got a 4spd in it now but i always wanted to stick a 5 spd in it for better freeway driving. i heard thru the inter webs that this 901/13 has the same final drive ratio as the 4spd i have now. is this true?
    1967 911 - #308439
    1971 911 - 3.6 hotrod aka Vader
    1989 911 - Carrera Cabriolet

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by G50911 View Post
    ... i heard thru the inter webs that this 901/13 has the same final drive ratio as the 4spd i have now. is this true?
    The final drive ratio was the same as a 67 4-speed, but the 5th gear is taller than the 4-speed 4th gear.
    And yes, all 5-speeds through 71 have dogleg 1st gears.

    Just be aware that 67 axles wont bolt up to the 901/13 axle flanges.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239
    Yes, all 901, 902, 911 & 914 are dogleg.
    Yes, the 4 speed generally has a similar top gear as a 5 speed, it is just the gap between the gear ratios is smaller for the 5 speed. Theoretically this means it is easier to find just the right gear in more situations. Freeway driving is not one of them.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    Yes, the 4 speed generally has a similar top gear as a 5 speed, it is just the gap between the gear ratios is smaller for the 5 speed.
    Dave, I think the 67 4-speeds had 28/24 "X" top gears... no?

    Jon B.

  5. #5
    Vintageracer John Straub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    La Quinta
    Posts
    3,184
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    Dave, I think the 67 4-speeds had 28/24 "X" top gears... no?

    Jon B.
    That's correct. It's shorter.

    John
    1959 356 Coupe, 1600 Super, sold
    1960 356 Roaster, race car, SCCA, sold
    1960 356 Roadster, show car, sold.
    1962 356 Cab, show car, sold.
    1965 911 #301111, Red Book Vol 1 "Cover Car," owned 54 years.
    1967 911 #307347, bare-bones, some road wear, a little surface rust, and a few dents..., owned 14 years.
    1970 914/6GT, (Sold - ran the last three Rennsports)owned 30 years.


    Photography Site: JohnStraubImageWorks.com

    Registry #983
    R Gruppe #741

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Jon B View Post
    The final drive ratio was the same as a 67 4-speed, but the 5th gear is taller than the 4-speed 4th gear.
    Here are the numbers:

    902/0 ..... 67 4-speed ..... Final drive 7/31 ..... Gears 11/34, 19/32, 24/27, 28/24 (A-H-Q-X)
    901/13 ... 69 5-speed ..... Final drive 7/31 ..... Gears 11/34, 18/34, 22/29, 25/26, 29/23 (A-F-M-S-Z)

    If you have a 68 4-speed in your 67 911, it could have either a 28/24 "X" or a 29/23 "Z" top gear.

    Jon B.
    Vista, CA

  7. #7
    PCaricous Fanaticous G50911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    199
    thanks all for confirming the dog leg. not a huge fan of it but it would be nice to have closer ratios and the over-drive.

    Just be aware that 67 axles wont bolt up to the 901/13 axle flanges.
    i didn’t know this? is it a difference in the spline count or coarseness? or length of the axles?
    1967 911 - #308439
    1971 911 - 3.6 hotrod aka Vader
    1989 911 - Carrera Cabriolet

  8. #8
    Senior Member beh911's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    3,605
    ..........

    Name:  901+trans+11148157357.jpg
Views: 169
Size:  97.4 KB
    1969 S Coupe #761
    Early S Registry #1624

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,239
    You are correct, in general. However, except for the 1967 911S the five speed trans also had an X top gear, the S got the Z gear. The AFMSX transmission gearset was THE ubiquitous 5 speed set for the early cars.
    Then in 1969 both the 4 speed and 5 speed got a Z top gear. So, in general both the 4 and 5 speed had the same top gear in the same year excepting the more powerful 911S. There are always exceptions.
    The change from an X to the Z was probably due to increasing emissions regulations. For 1970 the 914/6 got the ZA gear, and the 914/4 was saddled with a ZD gear; the 914/4 is lower powered and lower rev range than a six so the fifth gear is nearly useless unless going downhill. Climbing a hill you need to drop into third. But if you want a really low revving freeway ride, then try a ZD in your five speed 901.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    5,563
    Quote Originally Posted by G50911 View Post
    thanks all for confirming the dog leg. not a huge fan of it but it would be nice to have closer ratios and the over-drive.


    i didn’t know this? is it a difference in the spline count or coarseness? or length of the axles?
    Troy

    You've got a Mag Case 901. You can use 914 axle flanges in that trans. The 912 flanges only have 4 bolts and 2 roll pins. You can modify your axle flanges to accept the roll pins or just go with 4 bolts. In either case, you will be fine, unless you are planning on 300 plus HP. Knowing you, that may be the case.

    Jim

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.