Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Is this a correct 67s mirror?

  1. #1

    Is this a correct 67s mirror?

    Been going through my parts drawer, would this be a correct mirror for a 67S? THe pebbling and day/night appear correct, but I have seen others for sale that look different claimed as S mirrors, but perhaps those descriptions were “generous”? Is the extended stalk early and the 901 part number stalk late? What constitutes early or late? I don’t necessarily need an S mirror on my 912 so want to be sure.
    Attached Images Attached Images     

  2. #2
    Senior Member haul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    bavaria
    Posts
    2,333
    absolutely correct for a 67…
    very nice unit and if the „antiglare-flap“
    is working…quite
    perfect…

    enjoy

    https://www.early911sregistry.org/fo...t=early+mirror
    59 750 pre unit triton
    63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
    70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
    65 912 slate gray "erwin"
    73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
    erwin_loves_polo

  3. #3
    Senior Member moito's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    AUSTRIA (tu felix)
    Posts
    6,714
    Quote Originally Posted by 68912 View Post
    Been going through my parts drawer, would this be a correct mirror for a 67S? THe pebbling and day/night appear correct, but I have seen others for sale that look different claimed as S mirrors, but perhaps those descriptions were “generous”? Is the extended stalk early and the 901 part number stalk late? What constitutes early or late? I don’t necessarily need an S mirror on my 912 so want to be sure.
    the normal stem with extension is the earlier version ...the stem without mirror shown in your pictures is the later `67S (only) ... ...discussed a billion times here.....both items appear to be in awsome condition...very nice

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.