Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Final Stretch on 1973.5 Rebuild - Scary Torque Spec Confirm

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    126

    Final Stretch on 1973.5 Rebuild - Scary Torque Spec Confirm

    As seen below, I am on the home stretch of my rebuild. At 123k miles, it was a German smoke bomb with a dozen oil leaks. Exotech did the valve job and Mark said they were the worst exhaust valve guides he had ever seen and he has seen a few - awesome work by Exotech BTW. Once I am done I will post what I learned, did , and why for the benefit of any other 1973.5'ers pondering their options with our 6 month run of 84mm CIS pistons that are NLA.

    Having had pretty good luck so far on this I am down to one last torque that scares me to death, so wanted to confirm with you all first. The oil line adapter that connects the case to the oil line to the tank in the pic below has a specified torque of 88 ft lbs in Wayne's book. Can someone confirm that this is definitely correct? Do people do something less and had success? I am asking because that torque in the case freaks me out and I also don't want to go to light and have to remove an exchanger just because I was a giant chicken. thanks!Name:  IMG_3307.jpg
Views: 258
Size:  136.2 KBName:  IMG_3289.jpg
Views: 259
Size:  149.3 KBName:  IMG_3335.jpg
Views: 274
Size:  96.2 KB
    Member #3896
    1973.5 911 T
    1974 911
    1974 CB750K

  2. #2
    That is far too high in my opinion. The cam sprocket retaining nuts are only 75 lb ft !

    The rule of thumb is anything with a soft sealing washer can never be torqued higher than the crush of the washer yield torque or it will squish out and not seal.

    In the case of that size aluminum crush ring I wouldn't go past 25 lbs-30 lbs, the sump drain plug torque is 30 lbs according to the factory workshop manual and the size is very similar.

    Personally I put a small dab of green Loctite on mine and torque them to feel; never had one come loose in 30+ years.

  3. #3
    Unfortunately for your question those of us who do this every day don't necessarily use a torque wrench on every fastener, it comes down to developing a feel what is tight, or too tight. This is one those cases, I've never used a torque wrench on this fitting, but if I had to guess probably in the 65 lb.ft. area. The answer above is as good an explanation as any, only difference being that we don't use loc-tite, but rather a similar product, but it is a hydraulic sealant as opposed to a locking sealant.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    126
    Many thanks, I am definitely going lighter than spec and like the idea of sealant or loctite to boot.
    Member #3896
    1973.5 911 T
    1974 911
    1974 CB750K

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Santa Monica CA
    Posts
    2,042
    Also be careful when you hook up your engine oil cooler--mine got bent when a previous owner wrenched the attaching hose too tight and bent the fitting on the cooler--had to get another cooler.
    1. Chris-Early S Registry#205
    2. '70 911S Tangerine
    3. '68 911L Euro Ossi Blue

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.