Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: 1969 911E - Motor Question

  1. #11
    Just for reference on paint code 6851…
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Peter Kane

    '72 911S Targa
    Message Board Co-Moderator - Early 911S Registry #100

  2. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    Thanks for the photo of the paint badge. The code is correct, but it is not the usual one I see for silver in 1969; possibly due to being a Karmann body. I'd love to know the VIN for reference.
    Just for laughs, look at this thread for the "stranger" but more common 1969 silver code:
    https://forums.pelicanparts.com/pors...ode-plate.html
    Interesting.

    VIN is 119220570.

  3. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,240
    Thanks for the VIN reference, it helps my paint code research.
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  4. #14
    Member #226 R Gruppe Life Member #147
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    2,355
    Thx for the input, we love lots of detail pix.

  5. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Simi Valley Ca
    Posts
    501
    VIN doesn't look correct, should start with 11920XXXX ??
    Bob B

  6. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by SIMI BOB View Post
    VIN doesn't look correct, should start with 11920XXXX ??
    Bob B
    What makes you say that? The COA is below.


    Name:  IMG_5702.jpg
Views: 151
Size:  81.5 KB

  7. #17
    Senior Member HughH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Posts
    2,688
    Quote Originally Posted by SIMI BOB View Post
    VIN doesn't look correct, should start with 11920XXXX ??
    Bob B
    Karmann built cars had the extra 2 in the vin ie 11922xxxx to identify them as Karmann built not Porsche built
    Hugh Hodges
    73 911E
    Melbourne Australia

    Foundation Member #005
    Australian TYP901 Register Inc.

    Early S Registry #776

  8. #18
    Senior Member haul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    bavaria
    Posts
    2,333
    Quote Originally Posted by davep View Post
    Thanks for the photo of the paint badge. The code is correct, but it is not the usual one I see for silver in 1969; possibly due to being a Karmann body. I'd love to know the VIN for reference.
    Just for laughs, look at this thread for the "stranger" but more common 1969 silver code:
    https://forums.pelicanparts.com/pors...ode-plate.html
    thanks for the link…🙏🙏
    59 750 pre unit triton
    63 650 gray silver bikinitub triumph thunderbird
    70 650 astralred silver triumph bonneville
    65 912 slate gray "erwin"
    73 914 ravennagreen "ferdl"
    erwin_loves_polo

  9. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Burford, ON, Canada
    Posts
    4,240
    Note for Brbrbr: the completion date of the CoA is likely the Invoice date or possibly the date of first sale. This can be weeks after actual completion. I have a lot of data on the cars and know actual completion dates for a few, the Invoice date for many, an actual shipping date for one, and date of sale for some. The actual Kardex (a warranty record card) should be available for this car if required. This is a nicely optioned car. BTW, there is a Karmann body # to be found at the rear of the tunnel under the access plate for the shift rod coupling, and around the edge of the opening hidden under the carpet. The Production # (similar format) which is not the same as the VIN as in previous years can be found under the knee pad in the area below the radio opening in the dash.
    Regards, Dave
    Porsche Historian, contact for Kardex & CoA-type Reports
    Addicted since 1975, ESR mbr# 2200 to 2024 03
    Researching Paint codes and Engine Build numbers

  10. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Southern Ca.
    Posts
    1,170
    All '73 heads have the same size valves for T , E and S , but the port sizes are different , so if not already done have the ports enlarged to match the intake manifolds . I really like the 2.0S engine , but it was anemic below 5000 RPM so the 2.2
    is a good upgrade , but you loose the 2.0 S personality . The 2.0S production engine was the closet engine Porsche built to the race engines , but people don't like them because there's no low end .

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.