Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Beefing up a Sporto to handle a 2.5SS?

  1. #1
    Senior Member teenchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bucks Co., PA, USA
    Posts
    756

    Question Beefing up a Sporto to handle a 2.5SS?

    I recently had a 2.5SS motor built with the intention of running it with a stock 905/20 Sportomatic gearbox. Upon assembly and testing, the builder found that at peak torque between 5500-5700 rpm, the box couldn't handle the torque. He tried replacing the stock 905 pressure plate with a Kennedy performance plate but experienced the same issues. Upon disassembly he saw no harm done to the plate, so he's speculating that the torque converter might be the weak link.

    We're now trying to figure out next steps. One option might be to use a 925/xx box in place of the 905/20; another might be to use just the torque converter from a 925/xx. A manual swap is out of the question because reasons, so please don't suggest it.

    I'm aware there have been Sporto equipped cars out there that handled 2.7RS and 3.0SC levels of power, so I have to think that a properly prepared Sporto could handle the ~200ish hp from this short stroke motor. What I don't know is how to ensure the box is strong enough to handle that power. I know it's a long shot, but if anyone has any experience in this area (I've already cross-posted at the bird) I'm all ears. Thanks.
    (a) 1970 911T Sportomatic coupe
    (b) 2016 E350 4MATIC wagon; parts hauler for (a)
    ESR #1474

  2. #2
    I've never put a sporto behind a modified engine, but like you I'm sure it could be done. Like you I feel the problem is the torque converter. Drag racers are putting several thousand H.P. thru converters, I'd start with talking to the folks that build their converters.
    Early S Registry member #90
    R Gruppe member #138
    Fort Worth Tx.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2021
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    40
    At least from the parts diagrams the 925 for the 72-73 T/E used the same torque converter as the 905. The 72-73 S and 74-82 cars used a different torque converter with a 925 part number (but my understanding it just had a 400 rpm higher stall speed). And I agree that are a number of examples of Sportos being used succesfully in 200+ hp cars.

    I wonder if you are getting a cavitation issue with the Sporto oil pump at higher rpms (possibly there is a partial blockage in the torque converter oil circuit)?

    Following with interest as (one day) I'd like to build up my 70 Sporto T motor to give a "few" extra hp...
    '70 911T Coupe
    '73 911S Coupe
    '93 964 C2 Coupe

  4. #4
    Moderator Chuck Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Reseda, CA.
    Posts
    12,582

    Lightbulb

    I assume this 'R' did not have a stock Sportomatic ...

    (out of the Boschen/Barth book)

    Think I also remember the '4 cam injected R' also tested with a Sporto...
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Chuck Miller
    Creative Advisor/Message Board Moderator - Early 911S Registry #109
    R Gruppe #88

    TYP901 #62
    '73S cpe #1099 - Matched # 2.7/9.5 RS spec rebuild
    '67 Malibu 327 spt cpe - Period 350 Rebuild

    ’98 Chevy S-10 – Utility
    ’15 GTI – Commuter

  5. #5
    Senior Member teenchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bucks Co., PA, USA
    Posts
    756
    Quote Originally Posted by Chuck Miller View Post
    I assume this 'R' did not have a stock Sportomatic ...

    (out of the Boschen/Barth book)

    Think I also remember the '4 cam injected R' also tested with a Sporto...
    Chuck, IIRC the car pictured was running a 901/22 motor which put out ~210-220 hp. I've got to believe the box can be made to handle that kind of power.
    (a) 1970 911T Sportomatic coupe
    (b) 2016 E350 4MATIC wagon; parts hauler for (a)
    ESR #1474

  6. #6
    There is an old article of a Sporto modded for a turbo engine in Up Fixin (I believe), unfortunately I don't know the volume.

    I recall the factory provided parts and technical assistance. Also recall it being very detailed with some part numbers.

    May be worth searching, turbos = torque.

  7. #7
    Senior Member teenchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Bucks Co., PA, USA
    Posts
    756
    Have been combing Up Fixin' but have yet to find the article.

    In the interim we may have a solution, albeit not the most elegant one. We managed to find a low-mileage 3-speed 925/12 from a middie that we'll convert to a 4-speed while keeping the rest of the guts. Here's a gear chart for the proposed custom gearing.

    Name:  123_1(21).jpg
Views: 205
Size:  87.5 KB

    The T 4th may get swapped for a U, not 100% sold on that yet.

    Kind of a shame to put the rebuilt, numbers-matching 905/20 on a pallet but it's there if ever needed.
    (a) 1970 911T Sportomatic coupe
    (b) 2016 E350 4MATIC wagon; parts hauler for (a)
    ESR #1474

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Message Board Disclaimer and Terms of Use
This is a public forum. Messages posted here can be viewed by the public. The Early 911S Registry is not responsible for messages posted in its online forums, and any message will express the views of the author and not the Early 911S Registry. Use of online forums shall constitute the agreement of the user not to post anything of religious or political content, false and defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise to violate the law and the further agreement of the user to be solely responsible for and hold the Early 911S Registry harmless in the event of any claim based on their message. Any viewer who finds a message objectionable should contact us immediately by email. The Early 911S Registry has the ability to remove objectionable messages and we will make every effort to do so, within a reasonable time frame, if we determine that removal is necessary.